Is there any resource to learn interiors of a house for particular classes in 17th Century in Bohemia?

Is there any resource to learn interiors of a house for particular classes in 17th Century in Bohemia?

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

I would like to learn details of the living places for particular classes and professions in Bohemia in 17th Century. (For example a burgher, or carpenter guild master etc.)

I try some novels written in those times.

What are the canonical resources in this field?

Buildings and structures

panoramic of prague in the late 17th



the only one i've been able to find is the misseroni workshop, in the 1630's, it was a stonecutrting and glasswork workshop. Their house is still there, but i don't know if it's the same.

You could also research the 17th-century weapon workshops of Adam Brand, Paul Ignatius Poser, the Neireiter family and Leopold Becher.

probably also notable to look into this article:

History of Guilds and Crafts in the Český Krumlov Region, Bohemia

The article in question

There seems to be a lot of information in there, and by looking at google docs there seems to be many interesting sources on glassmaking in bohemia during that time and similar crafts

An Introduction to the Rococo

Rococo describes a type of art and architecture that began in France in the mid-1700s. It is characterized by delicate but substantial ornamentation. Often classified simply as "Late Baroque," Rococo decorative arts flourished for a short period before Neoclassicism swept the Western world.

Rococo is a period rather than a specific style. Often this 18th-century era is called "the Rococo," a time period roughly beginning with the 1715 death of France's Sun King, Louis XIV, until the French Revolution in 1789. It was France's Pre-Revolutionary time of growing secularism and continued growth of what became known as the bourgeoisie or middle class. Patrons of the arts were not exclusively royalty and aristocrats, so artists and craftsmen were able to market to a wider audience of middle-class consumers. Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756-1791) composed not only for Austrian royalty but also for the public.

The Rococo period in France was transitional. The citizenry was not beholden to the new King Louis XV, who was only five-years-old. The period between 1715 and when Louis XV came of age in 1723 is also known as the Régence, a time when the French government was run by a "regent," who moved the center of government back to Paris from the opulent Versailles. Ideals of democracy fueled this Age of Reason (also known as the Enlightenment) when society was becoming liberated from its absolute monarchy. Scale was downsized—paintings were sized for salons and art dealers instead of palace galleries—and elegance was measured in small, practical objects like chandeliers and soup tureens.

Photo Gallery

Post-Medieval English: 1600 - 1700

Boardman House in Saugus, Massachusetts, is an example of this seventeenth-century style, also known as First Period.

Post-Medieval English: 1600 - 1700

Boardman House in Saugus, Massachusetts, is an example of this seventeenth-century style, also known as First Period.

Georgian: 1700 - 1780

The Codman Estate in Lincoln, Massachusetts, typifies the orderly symmetry of Georgian architecture.

Federal (1780 - 1820)

Refining Georgian-style symmetry with elliptical and round spaces, Federal mansions such as Otis House in Boston signified urban prosperity.

Greek Revival: 1825 - 1860

Greek columns help identify Greek Revival houses like the Sarah Orne Jewett Visitor Center in South Berwick, Maine.

Gothic Revival: 1840 - 1880

Roseland Cottage in Woodstock, Connecticut, displays the asymmetry of Gothic Revival architecture, an idealized version of Europe's medieval past.

Italianate: 1840 - 1885

This unidentified Italianate villa, designed by Gervase Wheeler, has the low-pitched hipped roof characteristic of the style.

Second Empire: 1855 - 1885

Meeting House Hill Firehouse in the Dorchester section of Boston has a mansard roof characteristic of Second Empire architecture.

Stick Style: 1860 - 1890

Stick Style buildings, such as Fletcher's Neck Life-Saving Station in Biddeford, Maine, are the link between Gothic Revival and Queen Anne.

Queen Anne: 1880 - 1910

Queen Anne houses, such as the Eustis Estate in Milton, Massachusetts, borrow from a number of architectural traditions.

Shingle Style: 1880 - 1900

Complex shapes and forms within a smooth wood-shingle surface characterize Shingle Style structures such as this house in Waltham, Massachusetts.

Colonial Revival: 1880 - 1955

The Philadelphia Centennial of 1876 led to renewed interest in colonial architecture, such as this 1935 design for a house in Stoneham, Massachusetts.

Old Master "Lost" Painting Materials

The search for lost old masters materials had already begun shortly after the end of the Golden Age. Many Dutch painters had achieved extraordinary levels of technical proficiency that successive generations of artists were at a loss as how to reproduce. Speculation continued into the twentieth century, especially among painters who attempted to emulate the painting styles of the past. Fortunately, modern scientific investigations conducted by the principal museums in the later part of the twentieth century, have slowly come to a common position in regards. It would now seem that the almost irreproducible technical results seen in Dutch masters were, in fact, not due to any particular use of material or complex procedure, but were in great part consequence of superior creative and imaginative powers.

Ernst van Wetering addressed the question in his study of Rembrandt's painting methods 4 using the metaphor of the violin bow. "The impact of this rather simple implement on the richness of the musical effects depends almost entirely on the talent, skill and imagination of the musician who handles it. The same violin may sound either utterly dull or heavenly rich just from the way in which the same bow is hand. Rembrandt's pictorial richness is exclusively determined by the talent, skill and imagination with which he wielded the brush."

The composition of Rembrandt's painting medium, which had been the source of almost endless speculation, has been revealed to have been composed of nothing more than common linseed oil. Rarely did Rembrandt used walnut oil used, and the presence of the presence of egg was detected together with linseed oil only occasionally.


It should come as no surprise that artists routinely find inspiration from the world around them, and it’s easy to imagine the heady effect of 1930’s Paris on the most celebrated decorator and interior designer of the era, Jean-Michel Frank. Lucky for him, his projects were often centered around placing Picassos and Braques throughout the spaces he decorated, and his crew of influential friends included everyone from Left-Bank Parisian artists like Man Ray and socialites such as the Rockefellers.

Considered a minimalist with a rich bent, his layering of divine maximalism makes his work all the more intriguing and inspiring. As a furniture designer, his silhouettes were pared down and subtle and finished with luxurious details. Think intricate mica screens, bronze doors, accessories made of quartz, and the series of shagreen-covered furnishings and sheepskin club chairs he designed for fabled luxury goods maker Hermès. White was a go-to signature shade of his, which he at the same time made look both spare and complex. Frank is also credited with designing one of the most iconic minimalist pieces of furniture in history—the Parsons table—which he would frequently cover with the most luxurious of finishes.

Along with a studied eye for great design and an instinct for the best of quality, Frank took in elements of daily life to make a space feel more approachable, inviting, and realistic. Today his work continues to be celebrated in museums, his furnishings create record-breaking auctions, and you can even buy reproductions of his most iconic pieces designed for Hermès.

Research & Homework Featured Resources

The HistoryMakers is the nation’s largest African American video oral history archive. More than 3,000 African Americans have been interviewed for this video oral history archive. The collection consists of African Americans by descent, who have made a significant contribution in some area of American life or culture, or who has been associated with a particular movement or organization that is important to the African American community.

Ferguson’s Career Guidance Center is an electronic resource for lifelong career exploration and planning. It offers resources for career goals, education planning, workplace skills, finding apprenticeships and internships, conducting job searches, and much more .’s on-demand streaming platform boasts the largest online catalog of over 1,800 videos including concerts, ballets, operas, documentaries, master classes, behind-the-scenes footage and artist interviews.

A collection of reference eBooks on a wide variety of topics. Portions of the books can be downloaded onto eReader devices.

This teen digital resource features content to reflect today’s most urgent issues: mental & emotional health, bullying, suicide, opioid abuse, gender identity, school safety, sexual harassment, college & career readiness, and more.

Italian Renaissance Learning Resources

Ambrogio de Predis
Bianca Maria Sforza, probably 1493
Oil on panel, 51 x 32.5 cm (20 1/16 x 12 13/16 in.)
National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, Widener Collection
Image courtesy of the Board of Trustees, National Gallery of Art

“There is nothing in our civil life that is more difficult than properly marrying off one’s daughters.”

Renaissance marriages were not simply personal matters they were crucial to the network of alliances that underlay a family’s prosperity and prospects and that, in turn, formed the fabric of loyalties, affection, and obligation that supported civic institutions. Arranging a suitable match involved family, friends, associates, and political allies. In aristocratic families, marriages were a currency of dynastic and diplomatic exchange (as in the case of Bianca Maria Sforza )—and they were not much different among the merchant families of republican cities. In Florence, for example, , de facto leader of the ostensibly-republican state, considered negotiating marriages among supporters a worthwhile use of his

Florentine 15th or 16th century, probably after a model by Andrea del Verrocchio and Orsino Benintendi
Lorenzo de’ Medici, 1478/1521
Painted terra-cotta, 65.8 x 59.1 x 32.7 cm (25 7/8 x 23 1/4 x 12 7/8 in.)
National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, Samuel H. Kress Collection
Image courtesy of the Board of Trustees, National Gallery of Art

time and energy. Marriage not only reflected order, it was a civilizing influence on which the whole of society depended.

Brides, especially in Florence, were typically much younger than grooms. Women as young as fourteen were often married to men in their thirties, partly to ensure the bride’s virginity. The age disparity had a number of consequences. Young men were more or less free to visit prostitutes, who were semi-sanctioned in certain outlying districts. Relations between male youths and older men were regarded as fairly routine, particularly in humanist circles, in which ancient Greece provided a respected model. And, of course, the large number of very young brides corresponded to a large number of widows. Children of men who died remained in the man’s home and a part of his extended family his wife did not. Instead, widows returned to the control of their own families, who now had to reassume their support or scramble to arrange a second dowry sufficient to attract another marriage proposal.

Weddings and Dowries

Marriage customs varied somewhat from one city to another this account is based primarily on the many descriptions of weddings that survive from Florence, but it reflects general practices elsewhere in Italy. Before 1563, when reforms enacted by the systematized and formalized the process, the only requirement for marriage was the mutual consent of a man and woman not already married to someone else. Priests, ceremonies, and even witnesses were unnecessary. That did not mean, however, that weddings lacked elaborate ritual. Nor did it imply that couples chose their partners themselves.

A likely match was identified many years before a wedding, perhaps suggested by a broker or influential family connection. Negotiations between two families were sometimes sealed until the bride reached puberty and a suitable dowry could be amassed. Dowries, which consisted of goods such as clothing and jewelry as well as money or property, were among the greatest financial obligations that families with female children faced. Parents hoping to elevate their status paid large sums to place their daughters in advantageous unions, but even marriages among social equals required substantial investment. In Florence, a special public fund supported by an annual tax provided dowries for orphaned girls. Wealthy individuals also gave dowries for poor girls as acts of pious charity.

Grooms, too, were expected to provide gifts among the wealthy, these often included gems and luxurious clothes for the bride to wear during the wedding festivities (see “Wedding preparations for Caterina Strozzi”). Gifts, which served as much to advertise the groom’s status as to please his new wife (and her family), remained his property. Some husbands later sold their wives’ wedding dresses elaborate and colorful clothing would have become unsuitable after a few years of marriage, at which point women were expected to adopt more sober dress.

As the date of his wedding approached, a Florentine groom dined at the bride’s home and presented gifts. His visit was followed by a larger gathering of relatives from both families—males only—during which the final terms of the match were hammered out: the size of the dowry, a schedule for its payment, and the date of the nuptials. The arrangements were made public, giving outside parties a chance to raise objections. At this juncture, the bride herself was finally, albeit briefly, involved. During the ring ceremony (anellamento), which took place at her home, male and female relatives from both families looked on as she received a ring from her husband to be. A celebration followed, with more gifts and a festive meal.

Legitimization of the couple’s union (nozze) followed a procession through the streets of the town, as the bride—together with the groom’s gifts to her and her dowry goods—was moved from her childhood home to her husband’s house . In Rome, but not in Florence, the bridal couple normally stopped in church to attend a mass along the way. Roman brides proceeded astride a white horse, wearing belts their fathers had put around their waists to emphasize their chastity.

Marco del Buono Giamberti and Apollonio di Giovanni di Tomaso
The Story of Esther, 1460–70
Tempera and gold on wood, 44.5 x 140.7 cm (17 1/2 x 55 3/8 in.)
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York
Image © The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY

The wedding depicted on this panel, which was once part of a wedding chest, is that of the biblical Esther, but the action has been translated in time and place to fifteenth-century Florence.

These elaborate and very public festivities helped defuse any lingering dissatisfaction on the part of the two families whose interests were now joined (disputes over dowry amounts, for example) or any others who might have felt unfairly treated during marriage negotiations. Such resentment must have been somewhat common, given that a statute enacted in Florence prohibited onlookers from throwing stones or garbage at a wedding procession.

Public display encouraged lavish spending and at various times it prompted designed to hold such spending in check. It also helped create a vogue for specially prepared marriage chests. Usually called today (but known as forzieri in Renaissance Florence), the chests were used to transport the wedding goods—dowry and groom gifts—during the wedding procession and to store them once the bride and groom had settled into their new home.

Weddings and the arrival of brides naturally occasioned redecorating at the groom’s home, often including installation of with narrative scenes. Long and horizontal, like cassone panels but a bit larger, spalliere were set over chests, beds, or other furnishings, appearing something like backrests. Eventually they were incorporated into the wainscoting. Some may have been set higher on the wall than the word “spalliera” (from “shoulder”) suggests. Probably one reason they grew more popular than the painted cassoni was that the wall-mounted panels could be seen more easily. A painter’s skill in using perspective, for example, would be hard to appreciate in a scene set almost at floor level.

Cassoni and Spalliere

Marco del Buono Giamberti and Apollonio di Giovanni di Tomaso
Cassone with The Conquest of Trebizond, 1460s
Tempera, gold, and silver on wood, distemper on inner lid, 100.3 x 195.6 x 83.5 cm (39 1/2 x 77 x 32 7/8 in.)
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York
Image © The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY

Between the 1370s and about 1470, most cassoni had painted decoration. The outsides often featured heraldic devices and narrative scenes, while the interior of the lid—seen only in the privacy of the home—frequently showed reclining nudes or cavorting putti, or textile-like patterns that mimicked the actual fabrics stored inside. Few cassoni survive intact their various panels have been separated and are almost always displayed as individual easel paintings now. After about 1470, most cassoni were decorated with heavy wood carving or instead of painted scenes. The subjects once painted on the chests moved to the walls.

Florentine, first half of 16th century
Cassone made for Strozzi family
Walnut and poplar, 191.5 x 64.2 x 69.7 cm (75 3/8 x 25 1/4 x 27 7/16 in.)
National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, Widener Collection
Image courtesy of the Board of Trustees, National Gallery of Art

The Trebizond cassone

The Trebizond cassone was long thought to have been a rare intact survivor, but conservation work has revealed that it was reconstructed and is not in its original state still, it gives an indication of how the chest would have looked during the sixteenth century.

The carved cassone is decorated with the crests and emblems of one of Florence’s most prominent families. Such carving was often highlighted with gilding.

Both cassoni and spalliere offered spaces for families and artists to explore themes related to love and marriage. Most common were scenes of conquests and triumphs, episodes with suitable moral messages about the duties of husbands and wives from myth and the Bible, or imagery taken from , , , and other ancient or Renaissance authors. The values celebrated in these paintings—in the decoration of almost all objects made for weddings and newly formed households—were those most desired in the bride herself: beauty, virtue, purity, duty, and fertility.

Although a husband and wife would have had little opportunity to know each other before their wedding, most marriages seem to have developed into companionable, if not loving, relationships. Wives had few individual rights, but many exercised considerable power within the family and household. Business took many husbands away for extended periods, necessitating that their spouses play an active role in family affairs .

Leon Battista Alberti

, a humanist and architect who also wrote a manual on family life, signaled that wedding chests were not to be counted as ordinary storage. He teased wives about their appropriate use:

Dear wife, if you put into your marriage chest not only your silken gowns and gold and valuable jewelry, but also the flax to be spun and the little pot of oil, too, and finally the chick, and then locked the whole thing securely with your key, tell me, would you think that you had taken good care of everything because everything was locked up? 3

A Husband’s Absence

Bernardino Licinio
Portrait of a Woman Holding her Husband’s Portrait, c. 1530s
Oil on canvas, 77.5 x 91.5 cm (30 1/2 x 36 in.)
Castello Sforzesco, Milan
Alinari/Art Resource, NY

Bindo Altoviti, c. 1515
Oil on panel, 59.7 x 43.8 cm (23 1/2 x 17 1/4 in.)
National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, Samuel H. Kress Collection
Image courtesy of the Board of Trustees, National Gallery of Art

A husband’s absence could give new importance to his portrait. The identity of the woman who holds her husband’s likeness in Licinio’s picture is unknown, and her wan expression is a bit wistful and remote. The other picture is quite different. painted his friend, wealthy Florentine banker Bindo Altoviti, in an almost theatrical pose. He turns to fix the eye of the viewer, and Bindo perhaps intended his portrait to connect with one viewer in particular: his wife, Fiammetta Soderini. Bindo’s flushed cheeks contribute to the impression of passion, and a ring is prominent on the hand he holds above his heart. Bindo and Fiammetta, the daughter of a prominent Florentine family, were married in 1511, when Bindo would have been about twenty years old. The couple went on to have six children, but Fiammetta continued to live in Florence while Bindo’s business with the papal court required his presence in Rome. This portrait, which apparently hung in the couple’s home in Florence, would have provided Fiammetta with a vivid reminder of her absent husband. It remained in the Altoviti family for nearly three hundred years.

Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth-Century Art in Europe and North America

A lesson that covers the eighteenth through early nineteenth centuries will—at minimum —deal with Rococo, the Enlightenment (which encompasses the advancements in the sciences and Neoclassicism), as well as Romanticism. For this lesson, I like to use the death of Louis XIV in 1715 and Romanticism as my bookends.

Assuming that students will have just finished learning about French Baroque art and architecture, I like to begin class with an “unknown review.” By this, I mean a work of art that contains many of the features of the French Baroque but, also provides a way to set the historical stage for the next art period that we will be covering. My favorite work to use is Hyacinthe Rigaud’s portrait of Louis XV in Coronation Robes at the age of five.

Students should comment on the formal aspects: the color, the symbols, the drama – all features they have recently learned to associate with the Baroque, especially Rigaud’s other portrait of Louis XIV. The conversation always gets interesting when they begin to surmise the unknown sitter’s identity. After a quick debate over if the sitter is female, or a queen, or a child, give the sitter’s identity. They are looking at the first official portrait of Louis XV (1710–74) at the age of five, a painting made shortly after the death of his great-grandfather, Louis XIV (1638–1715). Comparing the two Rigaud paintings, students should be impressed at the consistency of the clothing: both monarchs are wearing similar white hosery, a blue velvet mantle with gold fleur-de-lis and ermine, and the chain and cross of the order of the Saint-Esprit. The props are also similar: crown, sword, and scepter are visible in both images, as well as the swag of red drapery. These similarities reflect a standard in French royal portraiture that would last a century, making for an eerie consistency that would not carry over into the rest of the art world.

Here it is also important to stress that many of the institutions that Louis XIV developed—such as the Académie royale de peinture et de sculpture (hereafter, French Royal Academy)—carried over into the reign of Louis XV. Also, the types of art associated with royal and religious patronage would remain dominant—especially in the case of history painting—which artists would continue to aspire to.

Themes to stress throughout the lecture include patronage, education, materials, and modernity. Government control of the French Royal Academy standardizes the education of artists to a point. Knowing an artist’s background and training becomes useful in visual analysis as well as—as one moves closer to modern art—what artists reject about the establishment.

Background Readings

Jean-Honoré Fragonard, The Swing, 1766, oil on canvas, 89 x 81cm.

A useful source to set the stage about the French Royal Academy is Christopher Allen’s French Painting in the Golden Age (Thames and Hudson, 2003). One of the most accessible surveys highlighting the Rococo is Robert Neuman’s Baroque and Rococo Art and Architecture (Pearson, 2013). Donald Posner’s article, “The Swinging Women of Watteau and Fragonard,” The Art Bulletin, Vol. 64, No. 1 (March, 1982), 75–88, unveils the mysteries behind Fragonard’s The Swing.

For the Enlightenment, I recommend a series of texts that are more focused upon specific artists. Judy Egerton’s George Stubbs, Painter: catalogue raisonné (London: Yale University Press for the Paul Mellon Centre for Studies in British Art, 2007) and George Stubbs, 1724–1806: Science into Art (Munich: Bayerische Staatsgemäldesammlungen, 2012).

For Neoclassicism, Emily Ballew Neff and Kaylin H. Weber’s American Adversaries: West and Copley in a Transatlantic World (The Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, 2013), is a wonderful source with chapters dedicated to addressing West’s grand tour and his art collecting practices, along with a wonderful essay about the masterpiece The Death of General Wolfe. Andrew Stewart’s, “David’s ‘Oath of the Horatii’ and the Tyrannicides,” The Burlington Magazine, Vol. 143, No. 1177 (April, 2001): 212–9 provides a convincing argument for David incorporating visual sources from his Grand Tour into this work of art.

For the US Capitol, see James D. and Georgiana W. Kornwolf’s Architecture and Town Planning in Colonial North America (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002)—a wonderful text about colonial and early American architecture. Also see: Henry Russell Hitchcock and William Seale’s Temples of Democracy: The State Capitols of the U.S.A. (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1976).

For Romantic subjects, see Darcy Grimaldo Grigsby, Extremities: Painting Empire in Post-Revolutionary France (Yale University Press, 2002). One of the best sources on Gericault is Lorenz E. A. Eitner’s Gericault: His Life and Work (Orbis Publishing, 1983). For Barye, see Untamed: the Art of Antoine-Louis Barye (Walters Art Museum, 2006).

For information on painting, Anthea Callen’s two publications, The Art of Impressionism: Painting Technique & the Making of Modernity (Yale University Press, 2000), and Techniques of the Impressionists (Chartwell Books, 1982) are invaluable. Each has a tremendous amount of information about the pigments, brushes and binders that academic artists used. Teaching your students to distinguish these characteristics will give them a greater appreciation for modern painters in the later nineteenth century.

Content Suggestions

A large amount of art was produced during this time, so I like to incorporate nearby architectural examples and works of art from local museums. These movements also have a great amount of variation. If you limit yourself to three main geographic areas: France, Great Britain, and the North American English colonies/United States of America, the lecture will be much more manageable.

In an hour and fifteen minutes, you should be able to cover the following works of art and architecture:

  • Jean-Antoine Watteau, Return from Cythera, 1717–9 (France, Early Rococo)
  • Jean-Honoré Fragonard, The Swing, 1766–7 (France, Late Rococo)
  • George Stubbs, The Anatomy of the Horse, 1766 (England, Science)
  • Jacques-Louis David, Oath of the Horatii, 1784–5 (France, Neoclassicism)
  • Benjamin West, The Death of General Wolfe, 1771 (England, Neo-Neoclassicism)
  • Jean-Antoine Houdon, George Washington, 1785–92, installed 1796 (France/America, Neoclassicism)
  • Stephen Hallet, William Thornton, B. H. Latrobe, Charles Bulfinch, Thomas U. Walter & others, The United States Capitol, c. 1793–1828, 1851–7, and 1856–63, mainly (America, Neoclassicism)
  • Théodore Géricault, Raft of the Medusa, 1818–9 (France)
  • Antoine-Louis Barye, Tiger Devouring a Gavial, 1831 (France)

For longer definitions for Rococo, the Enlightenment, and Romanticism I encourage the use of Oxford Art Online.

Académie Royale de Peinture et de Sculpture (French Royal Academy): founded in Paris in 1648 by a group of artists including Charles Le Brun. One of the aims of the institution was to move painting and sculpture away from craft-based associations, like the medieval guild system, by emphasizing the intellectual status of painting and sculpture over manually based activities. As part of its activities it organized the Prix de Rome, a competition for young artists that allowed the winner to study at the Académie de France in Rome. To receive membership into the French Royal Academy, artists needed to submit a reception piece. This work would forever tie an artist to a particular genre of art. The hierarchy of genres was codified by the French Royal Academy: history painting occupied the most important position, then portraiture, landscape, and still-life, respectively. Only history painters could hold positions within the French Royal Academy. After the Revolution, in 1795, the French Royal Academy was renamed the École des Beaux Arts.

Enlightenment: a term characterizing the cultural prevalence in western Europe and North America of certain shared ideas during the late eighteenth century through the early nineteenth century. Though not a single unified movement, it was founded on the belief in progress and in the power of reason. Recent achievements in science encouraged the belief that, through the acquisition of knowledge and the application of reason social, intellectual and moral reforms could be effected. The impact of the Enlightenment on the arts took various forms. Some artists paid homage to science, others studied the classical past. During this time, Classical art’s realism, restraint, harmony, and order, was in line with Enlightenment thinking. By using both classical style and subject matter in contemporary works, it was believed that the work could morally improve the viewer.

Fête galante: [French, ‘courtship party’] a category of painting specially devised by the French Academy in 1717 to describe Watteau’s variations on the theme of the fête champêtre, in which figures in ball dress or masquerade costume are placed amorously in parkland settings. In short, these works depict the elegant outdoor amusements of the elite.

The Grand Tour: An educational trip undertaken by the wealthy and artists, the focus being on the art and culture of Italy. This interest manifested itself in examples of Neoclassical art. This trip could take several years to complete.

History painting: a form of narrative painting that depicts several figures enacting a scene normally drawn from classical history, mythology, or from the Bible.

Middle ground: a metaphor for intercultural relations. It is a space for accommodation and hybridity.

Neoclassicism: Seen as a counterpoint to the frivolity and extravagance of the Rococo, it was a predominant artistic style in Europe and North America at the end of the eighteenth century and early part of the nineteenth century. What is distinctive about this particular classical revival was the emphasis on archaeological exactitude. The scientific studying of artifacts filled many publications.

Prix de Rome: the term applied to the premier student prize awarded by the successive state-sponsored academies in Paris. This allowed the painter, sculptor or architect to study at the Académie de France in Rome for three to five years. The Golden Age of the Prix de Rome was from the late eighteenth century to the early nineteenth century during the Neoclassical time period. History painting was strongly encouraged during this time.

Reception piece: the work of art an artist submitted to the French Royal Academy to gain membership. The work was submitted by the artist under a specific genre: history painting, portraiture, landscape, or still-life.

Rococo: a style of art and decoration characterized by lightness, pastel colors, grace, playfulness, and intimacy that emerged in France in the early eighteenth century and spread across Europe until the late eighteenth century. Though primarily an interior design movement, artists in painting and sculpture moved away from the serious subject matter of the Baroque. When the Enlightenment occurred in France, the Rococo it came under fire because it was deemed to have no intellectual underpinning.

Romanticism: a dominant western cultural tendency in the western world in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Hard to define, the movement involves the placing of emotion and intuition before (or at least on equal footing) with reason, a belief that there are crucial areas of experience neglected by the rational mind, and a belief in the general importance of the individual, the personal and the subjective.

Jean-Antoine Watteau’s Return from Cythera (1717–9) belongs to the early Rococo period. Currently, scholars believe that the painting depicts couples leaving Cythera—a mythical island of love—after spending the day there. If one understands the composition as moving right to left, the couple seated closest to the Aphrodite herm (a tapering four-sided shaft surmounted by a bust) seem to still be under Aphrodite’s spell as their heads are close together in conversation. As the couples move further away from the herm that spell becomes lifted. Moving towards the left, the next couple is beginning to rise, and the couple next to them is walking away, with the lady looking longingly over her shoulder at the first, seated couple. Down the hill, the spell of love is completely broken. Figures engage in social conversation, not the intimate type exemplified by the couple closest to the herm.

This type of enchanted scene, usually involving love, was common in the early eighteenth century. Cythera, and its effects, were depicted in theatrical productions and described in contemporary literature. Watteau created this large oil on canvas painting (129 x 194cm) to be presented to the Royal Academy as his reception piece, under the categorization of history painting. However, this painting’s importance stems from its ability to defy categorization within the existing hierarchy of genres (1-history painting, 2-portraiture, 3-landscape, 4-still life). Looking closely at the work, students should be able to see why it does not fit within any existing genre type. Simply put, this does not depict a religious or historical event with either an uplifting or moralizing message. Indeed, it refers to a trip to a world of illicit sexuality—though quite demurely represented. Incorporating classical details, such as the Aphrodite herm, makes the painting more than a landscape. Therefore, the genre of history painting was crossed out and was sagely replaced with fête galante, which translates to mean “elite elegant outdoor entertainment.” Unfortunately, by denying Watteau the title of history painter, he could never be allowed to become a professor at the French Royal Academy.

There is a great difference between the demure sexuality depicted in Watteau’s work and the innuendo depicted in the late-Rococo painting by Jean-Honoré Fragonard entitled The Swing. Commissioned by a wealthy man for his petite maison (pleasure house) the composition depicts an enclosed garden (as evidenced by a wall and gardening tools lying in the foreground) occupied by three figures: an older male figure pushing a swing, a lovely young lady who is swinging, and a young gentleman hidden in the bushes.

The sculptures, the little white barking dog at the older man’s feet, and other details hint to the relationships between these three figures. The dog, a traditional symbol of fidelity, is located closest to the older man who is probably in a formal relationship with the young lady. The barking dog (who seems angry) is looking at the lady, which leads the viewer to surmise that the dog (and not the older man) is aware of the lady’s infidelity. From there it becomes obvious that the object of the lady’s affection is the younger man hiding in the brush. The sculpture above the young man cautions for quiet, and the two putti figures below the lady glance at her and glare at the dog. The young man is perfectly positioned to catch a glimpse of the lady’s legs as she is swinging. Donald Posner’s article unravels the sexual connotations behind the painting’s the lady’s lost shoe and the young man’s doffed hat.

Your students may be somewhat familiar with this work due to a variation appearing in the Disney animated movie Frozen. Using I like to play the song “For the First Time in Forever,” and pause it when Anna jumps up in front of The Swing. The differences between the version in the movie and the painting are significant. In the movie, the younger man is removed, and there are no auxiliary statues. Though the shoe comes off, viewers are treated to a toned-down version of Fragonard’s painting, which now becomes mere innocent flirtation.

The Rococo was an era of aristocratic patronage. Towards the later-eighteenth century it gave way to its counterpoint, the Enlightenment. The Enlightenment, which was united by beliefs in progress and the power of reason, was concerned more with understanding and rationalizing our world through study. For the natural world it meant systematizing nature and the creation of menageries, for others it meant the careful observation and documentation of the Classical and Renaissance pasts. The creation of publications that document these findings expedited this spread of knowledge (a prime example being James Stuart and Nicholas Revett’s Antiquities of Athens, published 1762–1816 in London), at least amongst those who had money and could read. The Enlightenment took on different forms in different countries based on an artist’s/patron’s education and interests.

The Enlightenment

Produced in the same year as The Swing, George Stubbs’ The Anatomy of the Horse is one of the best documents showcasing the union of the arts and sciences during the Enlightenment. Stubbs is considered a self-taught artist, receiving only some training from a provincial portraitist. During his formative years, he spent a significant amount of time studying in hospitals and teaching human anatomy. He obligatorily undertook a trip to Italy between 1754–6, as was expected of established artists and young gentlemen during this time, but this figures less prominently in his work. Upon returning to England, he settled in Lincolnshire and commenced the project that would define his career the precise study of equine anatomy. Horse anatomy was an undeveloped field with no real pictorial advancements since Carlo Ruini’s 1598 publication Dell’anatomia et dell’infermità del cavallo.

After eighteen months of dissecting horses, intensely studying the skeleton and various musculature layers, Stubbs obtained the knowledge to depict horses with an exactitude that had never before been achieved. In London, this ability attracted patronage from the Whig aristocracy (who brought about the ascension of the House of Hanover) who held similar interests in the natural sciences. Stubbs published the results of his dissections in the 1766 text The Anatomy of the Horse. Executed without backgrounds, Stubbs’ meticulous engravings place the viewer’s attention solely on the horse’s muscles and skeleton from the front, back, and side views, which seem to hover in mid-air. In five steps, Stubbs takes viewers through the layers of muscles to the skeleton. This publication was intended first and foremost for artists, and then for the horse owning and breeding communities. Historically, England founded their own Royal Academy in 1768, in the image of that of France’s, which placed the animal painter at the bottom of the genre hierarchy. Though Stubbs would fight the stigma of being a horse-painter his whole life, without argument, he was the best sporting artist of the eighteenth century.

Jacques-Louis David’s Oath of the Horatii (1784–5) also belongs to the Enlightenment, reflecting the period’s strong interest in Neoclassicism. Appreciation for the ancients was instilled in David from a young age, his bourgeois background permitted him to have a classical education. He trained in the studio of Joseph-Marie Vien, an acknowledged admirer of the ancient world. In 1774, David won the Prix de Rome, which funded five years of study in Italy. While there, David absorbed the visual culture around him, which affected the level of archaeological exactitude in future commissions such as Oath of the Horatii. In Oath of the Horatii, David grafted the genre of history painting with Neoclassical sensibilities. Andrew Stewart’s 2001 article presents convincing evidence that the Horatii’s brothers’ poses may have been inspired by antique sculptures that David would have seen in Rome in the Farnese collection.

The subject matter of the painting took inspiration from an episode of ancient Roman history that had recently become the subject of contemporary theater. In the center is Horace, who is the father to the three young men on the left and the patriarch of the Horatii family. The young men are swearing their allegiance to protect Rome to the death from an enemy family, the Curiatii. To the right are the Horatii women and children. Among them are Horace’s daughter, Camilla—who is engaged to a member of the Curiatii family, and daughter-in-law, Sabina—who comes from the Curiatti family. Much has been said about the contrast between the male and female figures. However, the moralizing message—valuing your duty to your country above all other obligations including love and family—pronounces the work as history painting. Given that this work was due to the royal patronage of Louis XVI, upon the revolution in France in 1789, this painting served as a rallying point for republicans.

A significant reason I prefer Oath of the Horatii over the other great Neoclassical survey staples, such as Angelica Kauffmann’s Cornelia Pointing to her Children as her Treasures (1785), is because of the pigments David used. The darker color palette with its bituminous brown/blacks became a stigma undeniably associated with French Academic art in the middle of the nineteenth century. It allows for student’s to train their eye to recognize an academic work of art, as well as making for a greater contrast against the high-key pigments that the Impressionists would come to use.

North American colonial-born painter Benjamin West came of age during the Enlightenment and appropriately toured Italy, absorbing its artistic environment between 1760 and 1763. West settled in England, coming into royal employ in 1768. His masterpiece, the Death of General Wolfe illustrates a completely different approach to history painting in that it combines modern subjects, settings, and clothing with the traditional uplifting messages of patriotism and sacrifice. As the title suggests, this painting depicts the death of General Wolfe during the French and Indian War’s crucial Battle of Quebec in 1759. Wolfe’s leadership accounted for the British victory and his death catapulted him to the rank of national martyr. Admittedly West took artistic liberties within his painting.

In the foreground, thirteen people surround the dying Wolfe, six of them can be identified. In actuality, Wolfe died surrounded by only three. In the middle ground, we see a fairly accurate cliff-notes version the day’s military events chronologically laid out from right to left. At the far right the British have dropped anchor in the St. Lawrence river. The troops are in the process of climbing and dragging the cannons up over the river’s cliffs. In the middle scene the troops are in the process of lining-up and at the far left a soldier runs towards the group in the foreground with news that the British have won the battle. Displayed at England’s Royal Academy in 1771, the five by seven foot painting caused a sensation. Unlike the static, enduring quality of David’s work, West created a dynamic composition that blended factual details (gleaned from objects in West’s art collection, which contained everything from examples of American Indian artifacts to copies of Master paintings), bright colors, gestures, eye contact and expressions, and diagonals. For all of the innovation, some Neoclassical habits remain. It has been remarked that the American Indian’s pose is based on the Belvedere Torso, that Wolfe’s upward glance is perhaps inspired by a Guido Reni painting, and that the full-length standing officer who holds a bandage to his chest is a derivative of the Doryphoros.

The Death of General Wolfe also allows for a discussion about the, “middle ground,” or the fusion of cultures/hybridity. The ranger figure in green is a prime example of the middle ground. This ranger wears a combination of American Indian and European clothing and accoutrements, which reinforces his position as a liaison between the British and the Iroquois Confederacy (Mohawks, Oneidas, Tuscaroras, Onandagas, Cayugas, and Senecas).

This desire to graft the nobility of the history genre of art with contemporary events was also used by the French. The work of sculpture that probably best straddles the line between Neoclassicism and modernity is Jean-Antoine Houdon’s statue of George Washington. In 1784, the Virginia State Legislature voted to have a marble statue of George Washington created to commemorate his wartime service in the Revolutionary War. By necessity, due to the lack of a strong indigenous academic artistic tradition, the Virginia government had to turn to European artists to complete the commission. Ambassadors Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin, stationed in France, recommended Houdon. In his childhood, Houdon was surrounded by artists and began sculpting early in life, at the age of nine. He studied in Michel Ange Slodtz’s (a runner up for the 1724 and 1726 Prix de Rome) studio, and won the Prix de Rome himself in 1761. In Rome, he was enthralled with ancient works, but it was the works of Michelangelo that captivated him. It became a lifelong ambition of his to create a monumental equestrian statue.

Houdon traveled to America to Mount Vernon to take Washington’s measurements and to make a mold of his face. He also hoped to convince the U.S. federal government to commission an equestrian sculpture from him when funds permitted. Back in France, Houdon faced a clothing conundrum—depict Washington in modern dress à la West or in antique robes as tradition dictated. In the end, it was decided to depict Washington in modern dress. Though Washington stands in his uniform that he wore as commander-in-chief of the army, Houdon added many classical elements, the most noteworthy of which are the fasces (a symbol of authority, there are 13 rods—which represent the 13 colonies), and the plow (which references the story of fifth-century BCE Roman soldier, Cincinnatus who gave up the offering of absolute power to return to his farm). In 1796, Jean Antoine Houdon’s (1741–1828) sculpture of George Washington was installed in the Virginia State Capitol, where it stands to this day.

The United States Capitol was a revolutionary Neoclassical achievement. This federal building in Washington D.C. was envisioned as a seventeen-room brick building that would house the legislative branch of government. As time progressed, other functions were added to the Capitol, such as Washington’s tomb, and a space for the Supreme Court. First submissions showed that American gentlemen architects/builders failed to create adequate elegant and monumental forms that would define the nation’s new building type. Even then President Washington called them ‘dull.’ Ultimately, the chosen design was a synthesis of competition submissions, which had referenced many of the symbols and distribution of spaces used in other state houses, namely: a portico, a dome, a central public space, and the two houses opposite one another.

Despite having many different creators (William Thornton, B. H. Latrobe, Charles Bulfinch and Thomas U. Walter—who were a mixture of professional and gentlemen architects), the Capitol’s various parts are united in the Neoclassical style, with the focal point being Walter’s dome (1856–63), which was modeled after the Pantheon. Construction of the Capitol pushed American builders out of their material comfort zones. Originally proposed as a brick structure, it was decided that ashlar masonry should be used for the exterior. For the vaulting, Thomas Jefferson wanted to use wood, Latrobe pushed for masonry. Decades later, builders were pushed to their technological limits using a new material—iron—to create the Capitol’s famous dome.


Romanticism, which lasted from the late eighteenth to the early nineteenth century, was an imprecise movement whose main beliefs were antithetical to that of the Enlightenment, particularly the charge of reason. Romanticism is known for emphasizing emotion and intuition over or—Oxford Art Online says, at least equal footing as—reason. It began as a literary movement that then moved to include the visual arts.

Géricault’s Raft of the Medusa (1818–9) belongs to the period of Romanticism. Géricault received little formal training, preferring to copy paintings in the Louvre. This massive painting was shown at the 1819 Salon, under the title A Scene of Shipwreck. Though the name “Medusa” did not appear in the title, the public would have had no trouble making the connection between Géricault’s work and the recent disaster. To summarize: The Medusa was an ill-fated ship that left France in 1816, for Cape Verde, Africa. The ship ran aground and sank. Lifeboats could only save a portion of the crew. The approximately 150 people left behind constructed a raft left to cast adrift. For thirteen days, horrors ensued—fighting, starvation, dehydration, and cannibalism. When the raft was finally discovered only fifteen people remained alive. Survivors’ statements were quickly published, searing themselves upon the minds of the French people. Returning to Géricault’s painting, the horrors endured by the survivors are implied, not shown. Though Géricault conformed to the academic standard of idealizing the human figures, unlike a traditional history painting the emphasis is not an uplifting moral or heroic message, ideas traditionally associated with this genre. Instead, the painting focuses on the elemental struggle of humanity against nature. Géricault’s formal choices, especially color, gave precedence to the dramatic emotional, Romantic effect of the painting.

Antoine-Louis Barye’s bronze sculpture Tiger Devouring a Gavial (1831) also belongs to the period of Romanticism. Barye (1796–1875) was trained at the Ecôle des Beaux Arts from 1818 to 1824. The study of anatomy, particularly animal anatomy, which he learned at the Jardin des Plantes and at the Museum of Natural History, was of special interest for him. However, Barye did not use anatomical study as an end in itself and incorporated it into emotional narratives. Shown at the French Salon of 1831, Tiger Devouring a Gavial caused a sensation, with many struck by the violence of the scene and won him a silver medal. Here, anatomical exactitude is subservient to the depiction of violence, emotion, and instinct and is used merely as a way to heighten the naturalism of the scene. Keeping in mind that the early nineteenth century was a time when animal instinctual behaviors were being used to help explain human instinct, Barye’s predator/prey sculptures had a profound, perhaps soul-searching, impact upon viewers.

Christianity In The West 1400-1700

By John Bossy

Let’s explore those themes in more detail as we go through the books you’ve chosen. The first one on your list you’ve already alluded to, John Bossy’s Christianity in the West 1400-1700 (1985).

In some ways, perhaps, this is a self-indulgent choice. The book has simply been a great favourite of mine for a long time. My own copy was bought hot off the press in 1985 as a 20-year-old undergraduate, and is covered in rather shocking bright green felt-tip underlinings. It was a book that completely changed the way I thought about the history of religion. A subject that had seemed rather dry was revealed as really exciting.

One thing I would say is that it’s a very deceptive book. Perhaps I was deceived when I originally bought it, because it looks like a student-friendly textbook. It’s less than 200 pages long, nice big print, hardly any footnotes, a brief bibliography at the end, and a title which is deceptively straightforward as well, Christianity in the West. So it looks like a primer, things you need to know.

In fact, it’s an extremely daring and iconoclastic book that ranges extraordinarily widely. Some of its claims are perhaps exaggerated, or we might think differently about them, as Bossy himself came to. But the kind of book that makes you think differently about an entire field is very rare and is absolutely to be treasured.

“In the Middle Ages, Christianity or ‘the Christianity’ signifies a body of people. By the time we get to the end of this process in the later 17th century, Christianity has become an ‘ism.’ It has become a body of doctrine”

In some ways, it’s a difficult book to describe because it’s so rich, and almost every sentence carries an important thesis. The argument is that Christianity in Western Europe is profoundly transformed over the course of the 16th and 17th centuries, not just as a result of the theology of Martin Luther, but as part of a much wider process of religious, cultural, political transformation, in which the Protestant Reformation and what we used to call the Counter-Reformation—and now tends to be called the Catholic Reformation—are not only rivals but are also, in many ways, working in parallel to transform people’s experience of Christianity.

That’s a really important development that other scholars have picked up over the past few decades as well. The Reformation is not the same thing as the Protestant Reformation, and indeed, if it were, it would be a less significant phenomenon, because only the northern third of Western Europe, in the end, really settled for Protestantism. Catholicism remains the majority faith. In John Bossy’s view, the Catholic Reformation is just as transformative of Christianity as the Protestant one.

John, who died in 2015, was a very elusive and subtle writer who used powerful metaphors. One of these is what he calls ‘moral arithmetic.’ The ordering principle of Christian morality shifts, over time, from being focused primarily on the seven deadly sins towards being fixed much more heavily on the Ten Commandments.

That sounds very obscure, but it supplies an insight into a broader process. In Bossy’s view, Christianity had, originally, been a means of ordering social relations. It was profoundly communitarian and collective, and was concerned with the seven deadly sins because they involved things like anger and envy that were socially disruptive. Christianity was a way of managing these social conflicts.

Get the weekly Five Books newsletter

But towards the end of the Middles Ages, it started to become much more internalised, much more doctrinal. The thou-shalt-nots of the Ten Commandments are very much more about a Christian’s interior life, about their relationship directly with God, rather than with their neighbour. So it’s a profound set of not just spiritual but also political and cultural transformations that, in a sense, are summed up in that deceptively simple title, Christianity in the West.

Bossy is extraordinarily interested in the meaning of words, crucial terms like ‘charity’ or even ‘religion,’ which radically change their meanings over time. The key one, perhaps, is in the title: ‘Christianity.’ In the Middle Ages, Christianity or ‘the Christianity’ signifies a body of people. By the time we get to the end of this process in the later 17th century, Christianity has become an ‘ism.’ It has become a body of doctrine.

Still, the fact is that the Reformation led to religious wars between Catholics and Protestants across Europe—so the differences between the two can’t have been entirely negligible. People at the time certainly didn’t think so. What were the differences between Catholics and Protestants post-Reformation?

That’s an important question, and I think you’re absolutely right that some of the recent scholarship—and Bossy is not entirely free of this—that has seen the Reformation primarily as a process of social disciplining of populations and greater political centralization and cultural uniformity, has been tempted to iron out the differences. Of course, as a historian, it really is the differences that should interest us, because this was what was most important to people of the time.

There are many great doctrinal debates in the Reformation, aspects of which can seem strange—if not almost incomprehensible—to modern people. Perhaps the greatest one is what on earth Jesus meant when, at the Last Supper, he said, ‘This is my body,’ and then exhorted his disciples to ‘Do this in memory of me.’ It’s been semi-jokingly said that the Reformation is a bitter, 200-year-long dispute about the exact meaning of each of those four words: this, is, my, and body. People were literally put to death for having the wrong views on that.

The temptation is to say, ‘Oh my goodness. These ridiculous, barbaric people of the past. Thank goodness we’ve got over that!’ I think that is a dereliction of duty. One of the things I think all my chosen authors share is a willingness to seek to understand it rather than just dismiss it, and to enter imaginatively into that world which is, in some ways, like ours, but, in other ways, very different from it.

Guide to House Records: Chapter 1

1.1 In 1937, after a National Archives appraiser first examined the records of the United States House of Representatives, he concluded that the unbound records of the House contained a "great wealth of material touching every phase of our national existence."1 Fifty years later that assessment is still valid. A discussion of research techniques best suited to locate information in that "great wealth" of original records and related printed materials forms the bulk of this chapter.


1.2 Before their transfer to the National Archives most records of Congress had been housed in the offices, attics, basements, and storage rooms of the Capitol. They had suffered from neglect, vermin, and pilferage, abuses common to most collections of older Government records housed in unsuitable and unsupervised storage areas. In addition, when the British invaded Washington, DC, House records were subjected to a hasty evacuation that proved to be disastrous. The Senate successfully removed its records from the city, but the House was not so fortunate. Having waited too long to secure wagons, the Clerk of the House found that, "every wagon, and almost every cart, belonging to the city, had been previously impressed into the service of the United States, for the transportation of the baggage of the army." While some records were saved, others such as the secret journal of the Congress and a great many petitions were lost to the fire when the British burned the Capitol. The incident caused the Clerk of the House, Patrick Magruder, to resign.2

1.3 While the fire destroyed some records of the House, the rules of Congress affected the completeness of Senate records. Before 1946, Senate committees were instructed to return to the Secretary of the Senate at the end of a Congress all papers "referred" to the committee, but the directive (Rule 32) said nothing about materials received directly by the committee or created by the committee. Also, it was not clear whether the records of special and select committees were under the Secretary's jurisdiction. Consequently, some records probably were not preserved. The Clerk of the House was more fortunate in this regard. In 1880, House rules required that all committee records be delivered to the Clerk within three days after the final adjournment of each Congress and that permission of the committee that originated a record was necessary for the withdrawal of records. This greatly increased the Clerk's control over these materials.3

1.4 As the 20th century approached, both Houses of Congress experienced overcrowding. In 1900, the House temporarily solved this problem by transferring some 5,000 of its oldest bound volumes to the Library of Congress and continued to transfer some of its records to the Library for the next 40 years. Despite their new location, these records were still, as the statute stated: "part of the files of the House of Representatives, subject to its orders and rules."4

1.5 In 1934, the National Archives was established as the depository for the historic records of the Federal Government, namely all permanently valuable records of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. A preliminary survey by the Archives staff in late 1936, revealed that the Secretary of the Senate had been overwhelmed by his responsibility to protect the Senate's records. The Archives report indicated that some materials were on the floor in damp rooms where they were subject to "extensive growths of mold and fungi. Numerous signs of insect damage indicate an extensive infestation by both slow and fast moving insects. The presence of rodents was also noted in Room 5." The National Archives recommendation was to transfer all but the most recent of the Senate's records to the new Archives building. In April 1937, the Senate sent approximately 4,000 cubic feet of records to the National Archives.5

1.6 Securing the transfer of the records of the House, however, was not so easy. In late 1936, the Archivist of the United States received permission from the Clerk to examine House records. From January through March 1937, T. R. Schellenberg of the National Archives surveyed the House's historic records still stored in the Capitol building. He reported many of the same conditions that existed for Senate records, noting that some were: "exposed to extremes of heat and cold, to an accumulation of dust, to neglect, and accessible for pilfering." In another instance: "Room contains a slop sink, and has a leaking joint causing partial destruction of records of the 47th Congress. Room dirty and ill-kept. Records infested with vermin." To buttress its case the Archives sent a photographer to record these conditions. The photographs and the examiner's report were sent to the Clerk. A draft resolution authorizing the transfer, identical to the Senate resolution, was prepared by the Archives and delivered to the chairman of the House Committee on the Library. The Committee obligingly reported out a resolution and report to the Archives liking. For a variety of reasons, however, the House chose not to transfer its records to the National Archives until nearly a decade later.6

1.7 Although the transfer of House records awaited the passage of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946, records storage continued to be a problem for the House. In late 1944, the Washington Post reported that the House was in a quandary as to what to do about the mountains of records created by a number of special committees, such as the House Un-American Activities Committee. Representative Everett Dirksen of Illinois suggested that Congress should establish "an archives bureau for the preservation of the voluminous records of the special committees." Archivist Solon J. Buck suggested meeting with Dirksen to offer assistance if Congress really wanted a separate archives. "On the other hand," he continued, "the interested members of Congress should know," that the National Archives could be used "effectively for their purposes, with confidential records under seal and to be consulted only under authorization of specified officers of Congress." Shortly thereafter, Thad Page, the National Archives legislative liaison, contacted Dirksen and others offering the Archives help in setting up a separate congressional facility. Page noted that: "We feel that since Congress has already provided facilities here that would insure their preservation it would be the part of economy to use them." He enclosed copies of the 1937 resolution and report from the House Committee on the Library favoring the transfer of House records to the National Archives. A day later, Dirksen announced that he would introduce a bill to effect the transfer.7

1.8 In December 1944, Congress formed a joint committee to study the organization of Congress. This gave the National Archives and the historical community a chance to present its case on a whole range of congressional records problems. On the Senate side the inadequacies of Rule 32 were, of course, paramount. A change in the rule giving the Secretary authority over all committee records, not just those that were referred, was recommended. Also recommended was the transfer of the records of the House to the National Archives. The results of the joint committee's deliberations was the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946.8

1.9 The Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 became a milestone for the archives of Congress. First it required committees to maintain a record of their proceedings, providing for the first time in history a continuous record of committee votes and hearings. In addition, the act provided that a legislator's committee staff and personal staff had to remain separate, thereby reducing the possibility that personal papers and committee records would become intermixed. Finally, the Secretary was given greater authority over all Senate committee records and the House was required to transfer all of its records for the first 76 Congresses (through 1941) to the National Archives. The section of the statute governing the records of Congress directed that:

The Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives, acting jointly, shall obtain at the close of each Congress all the non-current records of the Congress and of each congressional committee and transfer them to the National Archives for preservation, subject to the orders of the Senate or the House of Representatives, respectively.9

The traditions of the House concerning committee records had been codified and extended to the Senate.

1.10 The passage of the Federal Records Act of 1950, completed the legal structure that currently governs the records of Congress. This act empowered the Administrator of General Services (an authority since transferred to the Archivist of the United States) to accept for deposit with the National Archives "the records of any Federal agency or of the Congress of the United States that are determined by the Archivist to have sufficient historical or other value to warrant their continued preservation by the United States Government."10

Records of Congress in the National Archives

Textual Records

1.11 The textual records of the Congress, nearly 50,000 cubic feet of material, are administered by the Center for Legislative Archives of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). The Center has custody of eight record groups three of them composed of the records of the Congress, itself, four composed of the records of legislative organizations, and one composed of the record set of U.S. Government publications—sometimes referred to as the Government Printing Office (GPO) collection. They are: The records of the U.S. Senate (Record Group 46), the records of the U.S. House of Representatives (Record Group 233), the records of Joint Committees of Congress (Record Group 128), the operating records of the Government Printing Office (Record Group 149), the records of the Temporary National Economic Committee (Record Group 144), the records of various congressionally created commissions (Record Group 148), the records of the Government Accountability Office (GAO), 1921- (Record Group 411), and the publications of the U.S. Government (Record Group 287).

1.12 The overwhelming majority of the records, over 46,000 as of 1987, comprise the records of the Senate and House of Representatives. In general, they span the years 1789 to the present with no fixed cutoff dates for either the House or the Senate. They include materials referred to and generated by the many committees of Congress, as well as the records of the offices of the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives. Few private papers of Senators and Representatives are included among the records.

Organization of the Records of the House and the Senate

1.13 An understanding of the arrangement of the records is crucial in formulating a strategy for locating relevant materials. The National Archives has organized the records of each major administrative unit of government into record groups. As stated above, the records of Congress in the National Archives comprise three record groups: Records of the U.S. Senate (Record Group 46), Records of the U.S. House of Representatives (Record Group 233), and Records of Joint Committees of Congress (Record Group 128).

1.14 Below the record group level the records of the House, 1789-1962, and the records of the Senate, 1789-1946, are arranged primarily by Congress, thereunder by activity and type of records or series, and thereunder by committee. This basic arrangement is reflected in the classification scheme developed by the National Archives in the late 1930's. Under this scheme each series of records was given an alpha-numeric file number that signified where the records stand in relation to the entire body of congressional records. All of the file numbers assigned to the general records of the House through 1946 are listed in the following National Archives publication: Preliminary Inventory of the Records of the United States House of Representatives, 1789-1946 (2 vols.). Senate file numbers are listed in a loose leaf inventory available from the Center for Legislative Archives. These finding aids are invaluable for anyone doing extensive research in congressional records.

1.15 Because many of the documents cited in the chapters of this guide are identified by file numbers, the following analysis of the various elements comprising a file number, such as HR 34A-G17.2, is provided. In general the letters and numbers to the left of the hyphen identify the Congress and congressional activity involved, while the ones to the right of the hyphen indicate the series and file segment within the records of an individual Congress in which a file is located.

1.16 The first element of the file number is either HR or SEN, which indicates that the record is either a House or a Senate record. The next number identifies the Congress in which the record was either created or referred. Beginning in 1789 with the First Congress, a new Congress has convened every two years. To determine the Congress in session for a given time period, consult Appendix F.

1.17 The next letter in the file number signifies the category of congressional activity with which the record was involved. These letters are common to all Congresses and do not change. For House records the categories are: "A" records of legislative proceedings, "B" records of impeachments, and "C" records of the Clerk of the House. The most voluminous category of records relate to legislative proceedings. Legislative proceedings include the consideration of bills and resolutions, the referral of petitions and memorials, the recording of this activity in minute books and journals, the receipt of messages from the executive branch, and election records. Records of impeachments document Congress' constitutional prerogatives to impeach and convict certain officials in the executive and judicial branches. The Clerk of the House performs numerous responsibilities, such as maintaining the Journal, examining legislation for accuracy, and in the 20th century, processing filings by lobbyists and candidates for Congress.

1.18 Senate records are arranged into similar categories. "A" still designates records of legislative proceedings, but "B" stands for records of executive proceedings, which relate to the consideration of treaties and nominations. Senate records relating to impeachments are therefore labelled category "C." The Senate official who performs duties similar to the Clerk of the House is the Secretary of the Senate, whose records are filed in category "D."

1.19 Within each category records are further arranged by record type or series. These series include journals, petitions referred to committees, committee reports and papers, and papers accompanying specific bills and resolutions. In the file number, the letter following the hyphen designates the series. Unlike the letters signifying the category of activity, which do not change from Congress to Congress, the letters designating the series change because new types of records or series have been created. Consequently, the "G" designation for the 34th Congress stands for Petitions and Memorials, but the same series under the 50th Congress is designated "H."

1.20 The records within each series are arranged in various ways depending on the nature of the records. The three most prominent and heavily used series—committee papers, papers accompanying specific bills and resolutions, and petitions and memorials referred to committees—are usually arranged alphabetically by the name of the committee to which the action was referred. In the case of these three series, records are often further delineated by subject. The "17.2" portion of the file number, therefore, signifies the committee and subject. Entries for the 34th Congress in the preliminary inventory of the House records, for example, show that the Committee on Public Lands is the 17th committee listed alphabetically under the series heading for petitions and memorials. Petitions received by that committee are organized under seven topical headings, the second of which concerns "land laws in respect to bounty, graduation, and redemption."

1.21 Use of the classification scheme for Senate records was discontinued in 1947 and for House records in 1962 although a modified version is used for some records of the House through the 90th Congress. In general records received after those dates are arranged first by Congress, and then by committee or subcommittee. Records below the committee or subcommittee level are arranged by series such as legislative files, nomination files, subject files, hearings, and Presidential messages received. More detailed information about the records can be found in the appropriate chapters of this guide.

Organization of the Records of the Joint Committees

1.22 The Records of Joint Committees of Congress (Record Group 128) are organized into two groups, depending upon whether they were transferred to the National Archives by the House or by the Senate. Both "House" and "Senate" joint committee records are further arranged by Congress and thereunder alphabetically by the name of the committee. Prior to World War II, allocation of the records followed no clear pattern. Consequently, records for the same committees may be among joint committee records received from both the House and Senate presumably because House members of a joint committee retired their records through the Clerk of the House, while Senate members retired their records through the Secretary of the Senate. After 1946, administrative responsibility for each joint committee, its staff and its records, was specifically assigned to either the House or the Senate. This action affects users in one important way: the rules of access of the Chamber that transferred the records to the National Archives prevail.

Non-Textual Records

1.23 Cartographic Records: Most of the cartographic records of the Congress were prepared by executive agencies such as the General Land Office and the Army's Office of the Chief of Engineers for use as exhibits or as appendixes accompanying reports to Congress. Some were published by private concerns under contract with the government. Some of the original manuscript maps form the basis for later published versions. While most congressional cartographic materials were transferred to the Cartographic and Architectural Records Branch of the National Archives, many maps are still found among textual holdings of the Center for Legislative Archives.

Map of the United States Including Western Territories. This map accompanied President James K. Polk's annual message to Congress in December 1848. RG 233, Records of the U.S. House of Representatives, National Archives.

1.24 The major series of cartographic records of the Senate include: Manuscript maps, 1807-1907 (278 items) published maps, 1790-1958 (777 items) maps relating to internal improvements, 1826-35 (244 items) and Senate committee maps, 1791-1866 (6 items). The major series of cartographic records among the records of the House include: Published maps, 1828-1930 (377 items) manuscript maps, 1807-1907 (278 items) and House committee maps, 1889-1985 (317 items). For detailed descriptions of maps published through 1843, see Martin P. Claussen and Herman R. Friis, Descriptive Catalog of Maps Published by Congress, 1817-1843 (Washington: Privately published, 1941). These records are in the custody of the Special Media Archives Service Division, Maps and Plans Group (NWCS), National Archives at College Park, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD 20740-6001 specific inquiries about them should be directed to that branch.

1.25 Photographic Records: The Senate has not transferred any still picture series to the National Archives. The House transferred about 300 items dating from 1880 to 1896. A few photographs are scattered among textual holdings of the Senate and House. The activities of individual Members of Congress, groups of Members, and scenes of the Capitol Building have been recorded by photographers working for other Government agencies and may be among the photographs accessioned by the National Archives from other Government agencies. The photographs mentioned in this section are in the custody of the Special Media Archives Services Division, National Archives at College Park, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, Maryland 20740-6001 specific inquiries should be directed to that branch.

1.26 Electronic Records: Among Senate records in the National Archives, there are electronic records from the following committees: Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities (Ervin Committee), 1973-74 Committee on Governmental Affairs, Majority Office, 99th Cong. (1986) Committee on Governmental Affairs, Subcommittee on Intergovernmental Relations, Majority Office, 99th Cong. (1986) and impeachment trial committee (trial of Judge Harry E. Claiborne), executive session, 99th Cong. (1986). Among House records in the National Archives, there are electronic records from the following committees: Select Committee on Assassinations, 1979, and the Judiciary Committee's inquiry into the impeachment of President Richard Nixon, 1974. These records, except those records from the Select Committee on Assassinations concerning the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, are in the custody of the Center for Electronic Records, National Archives at College Park, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD 20740-6001 specific inquiries should be directed to the center. Records concerning the assassination of President Kennedy are now part of the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection, Access and FOIA Staff, Room 6350, National Archives at College Park, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD 20740-6001.

1.27 Motion Picture and Audio Records: Among Senate records in the National Archives, there are motion picture and/or sound recordings from the following administrative units: Committee on Education and Labor, 1936-38 Commission on the Operation of the Senate, 1975-76 Special Committee of the Senate to Investigate the National Defense Program at Philadelphia Signal Depot, 1946 and the Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, 1972-1974. Among House records in the National Archives, there are motion picture and sound recordings from the following units: Select Committee to Investigate Communist Aggression Against Poland and Hungary, 1954 Office of the Clerk, 1979-1986 and the Select Committee on Assassinations, 1963-1978 (records concerning the assassination of President Kennedy are now part of the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection, Access and FOIA Staff, Room 6350, National Archives at College Park, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, MD 20740-6001). Among the records of joint committees in the National Archives, there are motion pictures from Joint Congressional Committees on Inaugural Ceremonies, 1965-81. The materials mentioned in this section are in the custody of the Special Media Archives Services Division, National Archives at College Park, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, Maryland 20740-6001 specific inquiries should be directed to that branch.

1.28 Videotapes of Floor Proceedings: In 1979, the House initiated televised coverage of its floor proceedings the Senate began its coverage in 1986. The National Archives maintains videotape copies of House proceedings from 1983 to the present and it has Senate tapes from 1986 to the present. Videotapes of House proceedings from 1979-82 are not extant. The materials mentioned in this section are in the custody of the Special Media Archives Services Division, National Archives at College Park, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, Maryland 20740-6001 specific inquiries should be directed to that branch.

Access to the Records

1.29 The Congress is specifically exempted from the provisions of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Acts (5 USC 552 and 552a). Access to the records of Congress in the National Archives is instead governed by certain House and Senate rules. Senate Resolution 474, 96th Congress, covers most Senate records. Access to House records is governed by House Rule 36.

1.30 House of Representatives: Rule VII, 115th Cong., provides that researchers can have access to records that have previously been made public. All other House records are unavailable to researchers except by the authorization of the Clerk of the House of Representatives. The Clerk's practice, following the guidance of the resolution, is to permit access to records more than 30 years old records less than 30 years old are closed to public researchers. For records containing national security classified information, the Center for Legislative Archives can initiate declassification action.

1.31 Under House Rule 36 most records of the House are open for research after they have been in existence for 30 years. Exceptions to the rule are investigative records containing personal data administrative records relating to personnel records from hearings which are closed under rule 11 and records for which access is specifically designated by order of a committee. The rule specifically states that any record that was made public before it was transferred to the Archives is to be considered open. The rule provides for restrictions on access to House records in order to protect the personal privacy of individuals, the public interest, or the privileges and rights of the House. Records that may contain national security classified information will be subject to the same declassification procedures that apply to all records at the National Archives.

1.32 Senate: Senate Resolution 474, 96th Cong., defines access to all Senate records at the National Archives except the records of the Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, 94th Congress (the Senate Watergate Committee). Access to the latter is covered by S. Res. 393, 96th Cong., and Senate Report 96-647.

1.32 S. Res. 474, 96th Cong., provides that records that have previously been opened remain open to researchers. Most other records are open to researchers after 20 years. Investigative records relating to individuals that contain personal data, personnel files, and records of nominations will open 50 years after their creation. Certain other records are closed by statute or Executive order of the President, such as income tax returns and national security classified information. Senate committees can change the rules of access to their own records. An example of this is access to the records of the Senate Watergate Committee which is governed by the guidelines set forth in Senate Report 96-647.

1.33 Although the Senate is exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, it noted in its committee report on the S. Res. 474 that the spirit of the Act should govern decisions on access. Therefore, the Center for Legislative Archives screens modern Senate records primarily to ensure protection of individuals' privacy. The staff determines whether the records contain information that is personal, whether this is public knowledge, and whether release of the information would be an invasion of privacy. For records containing national security classified information, the Center for Legislative Archives can initiate declassification action.

1.34 Joint Committees of Congress: Although joint committees have members from both houses of Congress, in practice one House assumes responsibility for the administration of the committee's records. The rules of access that correspond to the controlling House are observed. Access to the records of the Joint Committee on Taxation is controlled by the House. Access to the records of the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy and the Joint Committee on the Investigation of the Pearl Harbor Attack is controlled by the Senate. For more information on the records of joint committees, see Chapter 23 of this guide.

Research Strategies for Using the Records of Congress Unpublished Documents

1.36 Researchers who are considering using congressional records should first ask themselves if Congress was concerned with the subject of their research. If so, how did it deal with the issue and when? To locate materials among the records of Congress it is important to know the committee or other body that dealt with the problem the Chamber, House or Senate and the time period. Researchers who have tightly focused subjects with a specific time frame should consult the indexes and text to the Congressional Record and its antecedents (see paras.1.91-1.94) to identify the committees or other offices that had jurisdiction over the subject of their study as well as any bills or resolutions that may have been introduced. Researchers who do not know if Congress was concerned with their subject, or who have less well defined topics or topics that span a great number of years should examine the Congressional Information Service (CIS) index to the Congressional Serial Set (see paras. 1.102, 1.113). The serial set is a massive publication of congressional committee reports, documents referred to Congress from the executive branch, and other materials that can help researchers quickly identify the time periods and committees of Congress that considered problems relevant to their research. Leads gained from the serial set and this guide could be pursued in the Congressional Record and its antecedents for additional information.

Common Searches Among Congressional Records

1.37 The most common uses of congressional records have been legislative histories, popular opinion, claims filed before Congress, information from investigative files, treaties, and nominations. This section discusses the kinds of information researchers can expect to find among the records described in this guide as well as the information researchers need before requesting records.

1.38 Legislative Histories: Many historians and legal professionals have used congressional records to determine the legislative intent behind specific Acts of Congress. Traditional legislative histories have concentrated on the published sources of congressional activity, such as the Congressional Record and its antecedents, congressional hearings, and committee reports. However, the unpublished records of committee activity among the records of Congress can shed important additional light on the legislative process.

1.39 Description of the Records: While legislative files may include such published items as copies of the bill or resolution, amendments, the committee report, and hearings, they can also include the chairman's correspondence, transcripts of unpublished hearings, committee prints, correspondence indicating the administration's position on the proposal, and internal staff correspondence. In general, files created after the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946, which authorized professional committee staffs, contain more of these kinds of documents.

1.40 Information Needed to Conduct a Search: Researchers need to know the chamber involved in the legislation, the Congress in which it was introduced, the committee to which it was referred, and the bill or resolution number. This information may be found in the index to the Congressional Record and its antecedents or the Journals of the House and the Senate. Any bill or resolution that was considered by both chambers probably generated a file in both.

Engrossed Copy of H.R. 6400, Voting Rights Act of 1965. RG 233, Records of the U.S. House of Representatives, National Archives.

1.41 During every Congress, each piece of legislation is assigned a unique number roughly in the order in which it is introduced. Bills introduced in the Senate are captioned S. __, while House bills are captioned H.R. __. Senate and House resolutions, joint resolutions, and concurrent resolutions are captioned S.Res. __ and H.Res. __, S.J. Res. __ and H.J. Res. __, and S. Con. Res. __ and H. Con. Res. __, respectively. House and Senate resolutions are merely expressions of the sentiment of the parent body and as such do not carry the force of law. Senate and House concurrent and joint resolutions require the approval of the other chamber. In addition, joint resolutions, except for those that propose an amendment to the Constitution, require the consent of the President and have the force of law. Even when the bill or resolution is referred to the other chamber, it retains the initiating chamber's bill or resolution number throughout its legislative life. Each bill or resolution must secure passage before the end of the Congress in which it is introduced or it must begin the legislative process anew in the next Congress.

1.42 On popular issues, many legislators may introduce their own bill or resolution to address the problem. All such measures are then referred to a committee, which settles on one as the basis for legislative activity and incorporates or ignores provisions from the others. In general, the file of the bill that became the legislative vehicle is the one with the richest documentation.

1.43 Related Records: The first place to look for material on a bill or resolution is in the legislative files of the committee, but it is also worth looking in the committee's correspondence and subject files for additional information. In pre-World War II Congresses, these records are combined under a series of records called "committee papers." After 1946, committees often maintained separate series of unpublished hearings that may relate to legislation as well as transcripts of business meetings, and markup sessions (where the committee considers each section of a measure). Because executive branch agencies closely track legislation that is of interest to their programs, researchers should also consult the records of relevant agencies for legislative files.

1.44 To review the various versions of bills and resolutions as they passed through the legislative process, researchers should consult the printed bills and resolutions of the Congress, 1830's-1962, in the custody of the Center for Legislative Archives (for more information, see para. 1.114). Among congressional records are the drafts of bills and resolutions that were returned to Congress from the printer they are in several series labelled "original bills and resolutions" (for more information, see Chapter 24 of this guide). The final version of enacted bills and joint resolutions are published in the United States Statutes at Large (for more information, see paras. 1.115-1.118). To obtain the most complete legislative history of any measure, researchers should consult the publications described in paras. 1.88 through 1.118, as well as the holdings of the Center for Legislative Archives.

1.45 Popular Opinion: Studying petitions submitted to Congress is often a profitable way to understand popular opinion. The records of Congress contain thousands of original petitions from individuals and groups, ample proof that Americans exercise their constitutional right to petition the government. They cover the entire span of congressional history and relate to an extremely wide range of issues, such as pensions for veterans of the Revolutionary War, antebellum antislavery reform, woman suffrage, establishment of post offices and post roads, annexation of Hawaii and the Philippines, the League of Nations, prohibition, and Sabbath observance. These petitions are of two broad types: those in which the petitioner sought individual indemnification from the government, and those for which the petitioner drew attention to a larger social problem. The former category is described below under claims filed before Congress.

Petitions of Citizens of California in Favor of a Suffrage Amendment (SEN65A-J56), Referred to the Select Committee on Woman Suffrage during the 65th Congress. RG 46, Records of the U.S. Senate, National Archives.

1.46 Description of the Records: Congress receives petitions on the floor and usually refers them to the committee whose jurisdiction most closely matches the subject of the petition. A major exception to this procedure was in the case of antislavery petitions presented during the antebellum period. According to a "gag rule" in effect in the House from the 1830's through the 1850's, these petitions were neither received nor referred to a committee however, many are extant among congressional records.

1.47 As historical documents, petitions have been used in different ways. Some researchers are interested in viewing petitions submitted by prominent Americans, such as Abraham Lincoln, Susan B. Anthony, John C. Fremont, or Frederick Douglass. Others, attempting to trace the activities of certain groups or individuals from a particular locale, have examined all petitions received from that group over time. Another approach has been to examine all petitions on a given subject received from all groups over time. In addition to the names of the signers, petitions often show the name of their town or county of residence, along with an expression of opinion on the problem. Depending on the subject and the time period, the statements may be preprinted or individualized.

1.48 Information Required to Make a Search: For most topics, petitions were referred to the same committee for any given Congress, but for particularly contentious or otherwise complex topics, petitions on seemingly similar topics may have been referred to more than one committee. For example, researchers who want to review all antislavery petitions for a given Congress may find some among the records of the Committee on the Judiciary (if the petitioners advocated a constitutional amendment) the Committee on the Territories (if the petition related to slavery in the Territories) the Committee on the District of Columbia (if it related to the slave trade in the District) a select committee (if one was formed relating to the subject) or among those petitions "received," meaning "gagged" in the Senate such petitions were considered "tabled." Information needed to locate the petitions can be obtained from either the indexes to the Congressional Record and its antecedents (see paras. 1.91-1.94) or the Journals of the House and the Senate (see para. 1.95).

1.49 Researchers looking for all petitions from a particular locale on one topic or on many topics, face several problems. The indexers of the Congressional Record and its antecedents were not consistent in identifying the States from which the petitions were received. One means of surmounting this problem might be to examine petitions introduced by legislators from the locale under study, since most legislators tended to introduce petitions from their own district or State. Some caution should be exercised in employing this strategy, however, since a few Members who were interested in particular issues introduced related petitions from many States. For example, John Quincy Adams of Massachusetts submitted antislavery petitions from many States. Further, petitions referred to each committee are usually arranged chronologically by the date introduced on the floor or, in the case of claims, alphabetically by the surname of the petitioner, but rarely are they arranged alphabetically by State or town.

1.50 Those researchers who want more refined indexing, such as the gender, occupation, or the race of the petitioners, will probably be disappointed. For example, when petitioners described themselves as "fifty women from Vermont praying that Congress make liquor trafficking illegal," the compilers of the Congressional Record would probably describe them in those terms in its index and text. But in other cases where the petitioners' group affiliation was less clear, they were likely to be described more generically. Researchers may determine more about the petitioners by consulting other sources, such as census and probate records.

1.51 Researchers looking for all petitions signed by an individual, perhaps for a biographical study, may need to employ several of the strategies listed above. As the sole signer of a petition, the individual would most likely be listed by name in the index to the Congressional Record and its antecedents. In this case the researcher needs only to know the Congress in which the petition was submitted to make a search, since the Record and its antecedents are indexed by Congress (see paras. 1.91-1.94 for details). If the individual were one of many signers of a petition, an educated guess must be made as to the type of petition the individual would have signed. One researcher, for example, located a Lincoln signature by correctly guessing that as postmaster of New Salem, Illinois, in 1834, Lincoln might have signed a petition praying for Congress to establish a post road in his area.

1.52 Related Records: For the period 1789 through the 1850's, some petitions were published in American State Papers. See paras. 1.104-1.105, for more information on American State Papers.

1.53 Private Claims Filed Before Congress: Individuals have asked for congressional intervention in their behalf on a wide range of issues, such as compensation for serving in the armed forces, eligibility for pensions, rights to land, damages to persons or property committed by representatives of the United States, of foreign governments, or Indians, and the removal of political disabilities for certain former Confederate officials after the Civil War.

1.54 Description of the Records: Such files can include the original petition, the congressional committee's report, a bill introduced to alleviate the problem, a report from an appropriate executive branch official, and depositions from friends and neighbors in support of the petitioner's plea. These records can be quite informative, because they provide a description of the complaint, usually in the words of the individuals involved, and the judgment of the Congress.

Petition of Mary Todd Lincoln requesting a pension (HR40A-H9.1). Referred to the Committee on Invalid Pensions during the 40th Congress. RG 233, Records of the U.S. House of Representatives, National Archives.

1.55 Information Needed to Conduct a Search: In order to retrieve original documentation on these claims, researchers need to know the name of the claimant, the chamber in which the claim was filed, the Congress or Congresses in which it was introduced, and the committee to which the claim was referred. Fortunately the Congress produced a number of indexes that provide the information necessary to access the records. Indexes to private claims brought before the Senate and House were periodically published as part of the Congressional Serial Set (see paras. 1.100-1.103). Each index is arranged alphabetically by the surname of the claimant and shows the object of the claim, the Congress and session before which it was brought, the committee to which it was referred, the nature and number of any committee reports or bills, the dates when the bill was passed by both Chambers, and the date that the bill was approved by the President. These lists were compiled from the Journals of the House and Senate. A listing of these indexes is available in the Chapter 6 of this guide.

1.56 Several words of caution are appropriate for researchers interested in using these indexes. Not all of the documents listed in them are extant. In the case of those claims that were repeatedly submitted, the index indicates that a claimant submitted numerous petitions on the same subject, giving the impression that multiple documents exist. In fact, the same document was usually resubmitted numerous times. Finally, the indexes are best suited to researchers looking for information on specific individuals.

1.57 Those researchers interested in examining all claims on a particular topic or all claims submitted by specific groups, will find the indexes less satisfying. If all claims on a certain subject are sought, researchers may identify the committee of referral by examining this guide, as well as the indexes to the Congressional Record and its antecedents. The indexes are less useful in determining the group identification of claimants. (See paras. 1.49-1.51, for a further discussion of this point.)

1.58 Related Records: Over the entire course of American history, many agencies of the United States Government processed different kinds of claims. These claims files are described in some detail in Chapter 16, National Archives Trust Fund Board, Guide to Genealogical Records in the National Archives (Washington: National Archives and Records Service, 1982).

1.59 Southern Claims Commission: Genealogists and social historians have found that the records of the Commissioners on Claims, popularly known as the Southern Claims Commission, provide a wealth of detail about the lives of southerners in the 1860's and 1870's. The Commission met between 1871 and 1880 to examine the claims that those people who had lived in the former Confederate States had against the United States Army or Navy for property used, taken, or damaged during the Civil War. The Commissioners judged each claimant's loyalty to the United States during the war, certified the amount, value, and nature of the property taken or furnished, and reported their judgment on each claim presented to the House. The Commission received 22,298 claims for over $60 million dollars towards which about $4.6 million was paid.

1.60 Description of the Records: Only the barred or disallowed case files—that is, ones in which the Government made no payment at all—are among the records of the House of Representatives. Those records have been reproduced as National Archives Microfilm Publication M1407, Barred and Disallowed Case Files of the Southern Claims Commission, 1871-1880. For a more detailed discussion of these records, see Chapter 6 of this guide.

1.61 These files constitute a rich source of Civil War and Reconstruction history of the South. Each claimant and witness was required to answer a long, detailed questionnaire. Frank W. Klingberg, author of The Southern Claims Commission (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1955), estimates that as many as 220,000 witnesses gave testimony for the claimants or the Government in the process of the Commission's work. But because the Commission could compensate only those individuals who could prove their loyalty to the Union during the War, the testimony should be used with caution.

1.62 Information Needed To Conduct a Search: Researchers interested in finding an individual claim should consult the Consolidated Index of Claims Reported by the Commissioners of Claims to the House of Representatives from 1871-1880 (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1892), which is arranged alphabetically by the surname of those persons who filed claims before the Commission. The Consolidated Index also gives the office number and report number, the amount claimed, amount received, a brief description of the property involved, and whether the case was barred (failed to be submitted on time).

1.63 Researchers interested in examining all files from a geographic area should consult Gary Mills, Civil War Claims in the South: An Index of Civil War Damage Claims Filed Before the Southern Claims Commission, 1871-1880 (Laguna Hills, CA: Aegean Park Press, 1980), which lists claimants alphabetically by surname and by State. Because Mills provides the county of residence, researchers interested in all claims from one or more counties can easily compile a listing of relevant case files from Mills' index. After developing the list of individuals, however, researchers still must use the Consolidated Index to obtain the file numbers necessary to retrieve the original documents.

1.64 Related Records: Those cases that were approved in whole or in part are among the settled accounts and claims of the Third Auditor of the Treasury, in Records of the Accounting Officers of the Department of the Treasury, Record Group 217, formerly Records of the United States General Accounting Office.

1.65 In 1883 and 1887, Congress passed acts that permitted cases handled previously by the Commission to be transmitted to the U.S. Court of Claims for reconsideration. As a result, some of the barred and disallowed case files are among the Records of the U.S. Court of Claims, Record Group 123.

1.66 Those interested in the administrative files of the Commission should consult the Records of the Southern Claims Commission, part of the General Records of the Department of the Treasury, Record Group 56. Those records have been reproduced as National Archives Microfilm Publication M87, Records of the Commissioners of Claims (Southern Claims Commission), 1871-1880.

Telegram from John Carter to Rep. John S. Wood requesting an investigation of Katherine Hepburn from February 13, 1954 to the Committee on Un-American Activities. RG 233, Records of the U.S. House of Representatives, National Archives.

1.67 Investigative Files: Congress has the authority to investigate perceived problems in any area of American society, but particularly within the Federal Government. For example, Congress has investigated the national military establishment from the Indians' defeat of Arthur St. Clair in 1792, to the manner in which the Civil War was prosecuted in the 1860's, to the dismissal of General Douglas MacArthur in the 1950's. In the 20th century, Congress has examined various facets of the economy through investigations of the banking community in 1912 and 1933, labor unions' organizational difficulties in the late 1930's, and the munitions makers of World War I. Congress also reviewed the activities of organized crime and subversion through committees such as the House Un-American Activities Committee (1945-1975).

1.68 Description of the Records: Often a tremendous amount of data is compiled on the subject of an investigation. Among the records of the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee, for example, are files on individuals who were considered security risks. The files of a number of investigative committees of the 20th century contain copies of the financial records of many large corporations and other economic data of interest to students of the business community. Because some information contained in the records of 20th century investigative committees may be considered sensitive, the National Archives staff must screen these materials prior to their release. Researchers interested in using investigative records should therefore contact the Center for Legislative Archives well in advance of their proposed research visit.

1.69 Information Needed to Conduct a Search: The records of each investigation are organized by the administrative unit that conducted the investigation, usually subcommittees of a standing committee or select or special committees. See Chapters 2-25 of this guide for more detailed information on the records of House committees.

1.70 Treaties: The Constitution provides that the President must seek the advice and consent of the Senate on all treaties. The concurrence of two-thirds of the Senators present when a treaty is considered by Congress is necessary.

1.71 Description of the Records: Treaty files may include a copy of the proposed treaty, a message from the President, a copy of the committee's report, transcripts of hearings, committee prints, correspondence of committee chairman, correspondence indicating the administration's position, internal staff communications, and for treaties relating to taxation, a statement from the Joint Committee on Taxation and the Department of the Treasury. Treaty files that postdate the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946, which authorized the creation of professional staff for committees, are more likely to contain fuller documentation. The records are in two series: Indian treaties, 1789-1870, and foreign treaties, 1789-present.

1.72 Information Needed to Conduct a Search: Researchers need to know the Congress in which the treaty was disposed of by the Senate and the parties to the treaty. This means that if the President submitted a treaty before one Congress and it was neither accepted nor rejected until the next Congress, records of the treaty are in the latter Congress. This disposition information can be located in either the Congressional Record and its antecedents or the Senate Executive Journal (see para. 1.89 for more information on the Journal).

1.73 Related Records: Related records are also available in other record groups in the National Archives. Many of these records have been filmed. Ratified Indian treaties are located in Record Group 11, General Records of the U.S. Government and are filmed as National Archives Microfilm Publication M668, Ratified Indian Treaties, 1722-1869. The treaties were published in Vol. II of Charles J. Kappler's, Indian Affairs: Laws and Treaties (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1904). Supporting documents pertaining to the negotiation and ratification of Indian treaties are in Record Group 75, Records of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and they have been filmed as National Archives Microfilm Publication T494, Documents Relating to the Negotiation of Ratified and Unratified Treaties with Various Indian Tribes, 1801-1869. Researchers should also consult John H. Martin's compilation: List of Documents Concerning the Negotiation of Ratified Indian Treaties, 1801- 1869, Special List 6 (Washington: National Archives, 1949), which identifies documents that are not included in Microfilm Publication T494. Researchers interested in international treaties and conventions should consult the inventories of General Records of the U.S. Government, Record Group 11, and General Records of the Department of State, Record Group 59.

1.74 Nominations. As with treaties, the Senate must provide its advise and consent on the nomination of a number of presidential appointments, such as cabinet officers, Federal judges, postmasters, and officers in the Armed Forces.

1.75 Description of the Records: A nomination file may include such documents as a transcript of the nomination hearing, resume of the nominee, letters of recommendation from individuals and professional organizations, financial disclosure information, correspondence from the administration, committee vote tallies, petitions from interested citizens, and internal staff memoranda. The records are arranged in two series: Messages of the President (placing a candidate's name in nomination) and the nomination files.

Nomination of Sandra Day O'Connor as Supreme Court Justice on August 19, 1981. RG 46, Records of the U.S. Senate, National Archives.

1.76 Information Needed to Conduct a Search: Nomination files are arranged by the Congress in which the appointment was made and then alphabetically by the surname of the candidate. Beginning with the 80th Congress (1947-49), the records are arranged by the Congress, thereunder by the committee to which the nomination was referred, and thereunder alphabetically by the surname of the nominee. The appropriate Congress and committee can be located in either the Congressional Record and its antecedents or the Senate Executive Journal. The National Archives has published a listing of all of the nomination files from 1789-1901: George P. Perros, James C. Brown, and Jacqueline A. Wood, compilers, Papers of the United States Senate Relating to Presidential Nominations, 1789-1901 Special List 20, (Washington: National Archives and Records Service, 1964).

1.77 Related Records: There may be additional documentation among the records of the government agency to which the candidate was nominated and the records of the Office of the President.

Citing Unpublished Congressional Documents

1.78 In citing unpublished governmental records, researchers are encouraged to consult NARA's General Information Leaflet 17: "Citing Records in the National Archives of the United States." In line with this Leaflet, the following specific guidance is provided for researchers citing unpublished congressional materials.

1.79 The Elements of a Citation: The purpose of any citation is to promote the easy retrieval of the materials cited. To facilitate retrieval, researchers are encouraged to identify the following elements in their citations to unpublished congressional records: record, file unit, series, Congress, record group, and repository. Obviously, in subsequent notes some of this information can be abbreviated. Each element of the note should be separated by a semicolon to avoid confusion. In general it is not necessary to cite the session of Congress since few unpublished congressional records are arranged by session. What follows is more precise guidance on each of the elements of a citation.

1.80 Record: A record is a unit of information, regardless of physical form. The citation should identify the document, its date and, where appropriate, its author and recipient. For many 18th-and-19th-century documents the identifying data is found in the document's endorsement. The endorsement, written on the back of a document, shows when the item was received and what actions were taken on the subject of the document. If the date of the document differs from the endorsement date, which is usually the case, cite the document date and in parentheses indicate the date of the first endorsement. The endorsement date is important, because it is often the date that is used for filing these documents.

1.81 File Unit: A file unit may be a single record, a bound volume, or an envelope or file folder that contains various types of records. In some series of congressional records, such as committee papers, petitions referred to committees, treaty files, and Indian treaty files, there are important subdivisions that need to be noted for ease of retrieval. For committee papers, committee reports and papers, petitions referred to committee, papers accompanying specific bills and resolutions: Identify the committee to which the matter was referred (for papers accompanying specific bills and resolutions, include the bill or resolution number as well). For foreign and Indian treaty files: Identify the specific treaty.

For nominations: Identify the name of the nominee.

1.82 Series: A series may be a single file or several files brought together because of their common arrangement, source, use, or physical form. Many congressional records are organized in the following series:

  • Original journals
  • Original bills and resolutions
  • Committee papers
  • Committee reports and papers
  • President's messages
  • Reports and communications submitted to the [House or Senate]
  • Petitions and memorials referred to committee
  • Petitions and memorials that were tabled
  • Election records
  • Records of impeachments
  • Records of the Clerk of the House

1.83 For House records, 1789-1962, and Senate records, 1789-1946, researchers should cite the file number in parentheses immediately after the series title. The file number bears a HR or SEN designation, depending on whether it was a House or Senate record, an initial number indicating the Congress, and other letters and numbers, such as HR 69A-H6.13, which indicate the series and subgroups to which the records belong. See paras. 1.20-1.26, for a more detailed explanation of the file numbers.

1.84 Congress: A new Congress begins every two years, following the congressional elections. Each has been numbered sequentially beginning with the First Congress, which met from 1789 to 1791.

1.85 Record Group: The record groups for congressional materials are listed below with accepted abbreviations in parentheses:

  • Record Group 46—Records of the U.S. Senate (RG 46)
  • Record Group 233—Records of the U.S. House of Representatives (RG 233)
  • Record Group 128—Records of Joint Committees of Congress (RG 128)
  • Record Group 287—Publications of the U.S. Government (RG 287)

1.86 Repository: All records of the Congress in the custody of the National Archives and Records Administration are in the National Archives, Washington, DC. This element may be abbreviated as NA.

1.87 Examples of Notes: Below are examples of how to cite congressional materials. All of the documents are fictitious

  • Fifty women from Vermont praying an end to slavery in the District of Columbia, Jan. 15, 1838 (endorsed Feb. 7, 1838) Committee on the District of Columbia Petitions and Memorials Referred to Committees (HR 25A-G4.1) 25th Congress Records of the U.S. House of Representatives, Record Group 233 National Archives, Washington, DC.
  • President's message, March 10, 1808 (endorsed March 12, 1808) Treaty with the Cherokees Indian Treaty Files (SEN 12B-C1) 12th Congress Records of the U.S. Senate, Record Group 46 National Archives, Washington, DC.
  • Original Legislative Journal, Dec. 6, 1847, page 3 First Session (SEN 30A-A2) 30th Congress Records of the U.S. Senate, Record Group 46 National Archives, Washington, DC.
  • Petition of Robert W. Smith, Apr. 17, 1874 Report 4, Office 123 Disallowed Claims Files Records of the Commissioners on Claims Records of the U.S. House of Representatives, Record Group 233 National Archives, Washington, DC.
  • William Smith to Walter Jones, Jan. 5, 1956 Hanford Power Plant unclassified subject files Records of the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, Record Group 128 National Archives, Washington, DC.
  • Hearings on the Situation in Cuba, Jan. 9, 1963, page 56 formerly classified hearings Committee on Foreign Relations 88th Congress Records of the U.S. Senate, Record Group 46 National Archives, Washington, DC.
  • James Jones to Jay Sourwine, July 7, 1952 Owen Lattimore file Individuals files Subcommittee on Internal Security 82d Congress Records of the U.S. Senate, Record Group 46 National Archives, Washington, DC.
  • John Doe to Alexander Smith, Dec. 3, 1946 Individuals: Philip Murray Special Committee to Investigate the National Defense Program, 1941-48 Records of the U.S. Senate, Record Group 46 National Archives, Washington, DC.

Published Congressional Documents

1.88 More than any other agency of the Federal Government, the Congress publishes an extensive record of its activities. The most important examples of this effort are listed and described below. These publications are available in the Library and Printed Archives Division of the National Archives and may also be available in Government Depository Libraries located around the United States. Additional information about the depository library system is provided in Appendix E of this guide.

1.89 Congressional publications fall into two categories: those that record activities conducted on the floor of Congress and those that record activities in its committee.

Records of Floor Proceedings

1.90 The quality of the record of debates and actions that take place on the floor of Congress have varied widely throughout the history of Congress. The Constitution stipulates in Article I, section 5, that Congress simply maintain a journal of its proceedings. Production of an accurate record of the actual speeches and debates developed slowly. In part this was due to congressional traditions. All Senate proceedings held during the period 1789 to December 1795, for example, were closed to the public. Senate proceedings on its executive business (treaties and nominations) were also closed to the public until the 1920's. House deliberations on the other hand have, except on rare occasions, always been open to the public. Because of the poor quality of early efforts at transcription, legislators insisted on the right to edit their remarks. This is permitted for the style but not the substance of remarks. In order to expedite business, Members of Congress have also been permitted to submit materials for incorporation into the record that they did not actually read on the floor.

1.91 Annals of Congress (1789-1824): During its first 3 decades, Congress did not produce its own transcription of its proceedings. In the 1830's, two pioneers in reporting congressional activity, Joseph Gales and William Seaton, used contemporary newspaper and other sources to reconstruct congressional debates from the earlier period. The Annals of Congress reproduced the speeches and debates as abstracts written in the third person. Each volume is indexed. Gales and Seaton were also publishers of the newspaper the National Intelligencer, which specialized in congressional coverage.

1.92 Register of Debates (1824-1837): Gales and Seaton published this contemporaneous abstraction of congressional floor debates. Each volume is indexed.

1.93 Congressional Globe (1833-1873): Francis P. Blair and John C. Rives, publishers of the Congressional Globe, became the authorized printer of congressional debates in 1833. In its later years the Globe reconstructed what appeared to be a verbatim transcription (done in the first person) rather than printing primarily third person abstracts.

1.94 Congressional Record (1873-present): While the Congressional Record has always looked like a verbatim transcription, members can edit their remarks and submit remarks that were not delivered on the floor. These remarks appear in the text as if they were delivered on the floor. Beginning in March 1978, remarks that were not actually delivered were indicated by a printer's "bullet" in the margin. However, Members can circumvent this device. For instance, if the first sentence of a speech is actually delivered on the floor and the rest is turned in for printing, the "bullet" does not appear in the margin. Most recently those remarks not delivered on the floor are printed in a different type face. In 1947, the Congressional Record produced a new publication: the Daily Digest. The Daily Digest records floor and committee proceedings each day. The Congressional Record is indexed by subject and by bill and resolution number.

First page of the House Journal of the first session of the First Congress. RG 233, Records of the U.S. House of Representatives, National Archives.

1.95 House and Senate Journals (1789-present): The Journals are the only constitutionally mandated record of floor proceedings. The Journals record actions taken on the floor, such as the receipt of messages, the introduction of bills, the referral of petitions or bills to committees, and all roll call votes. All of these activities are also recorded in the publications noted above. The Journals reproduce none of the debates and speeches. While the House produces one Journal, the Senate publishes the Senate Legislative Journal to record its legislative proceedings and the Senate Executive Journal to record proceedings on treaties and nominations. Each volume is indexed by subject and by bill or resolution number. The Senate Executive Journal is indexed by the surnames of individuals whose names were placed in nomination. Beginning in 1829 geographical place names are also indexed. Later volumes also divide the personal names section into segments for the agencies or Departments to which the individuals had been nominated.

1.96 House and Senate Manuals: Those interested in understanding the fine points of transacting business on the floor of Congress should consult the House Manual and Senate Manual appropriate to the time period under study. The Manuals are published in the Congressional Serial Set. In addition researchers should consult the compilations of precedents listed below for information on how each Chamber was organized and how its business was conducted. These precedents were developed over time by each House of Congress through rulings from the chair and actions of the entire body.

1.97 House and Senate Precedents: In 1907, Asher C. Hinds produced the first systematic codification of House precedents. Published by the Government Printing Office as Hinds' Precedents of the House of Representatives of the United States, they are organized into categories such as the meeting of Congress, the presiding officer at organization, procedure and powers of the Members-elect in organization, polygamy, disqualifications, irregular credentials, and impeachment. There is also a subject index. Revisions to Hinds appeared in the 1930's and 1970's: Clarence Cannon, Cannon's Precedents of the House of Representatives of the United States (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1935) and Lewis Deschler, Deschler's Precedents of the United States House of Representatives, H. Doc. 94-661 (Serial 13151-1).

1.98 A similar, but much less extensive, work for the Senate was compiled by Charles Watkins and Floyd Riddick and was based on earlier editions by editors such as Henry Gilfrey (1909). The most recent version is: Senate Procedure, Precedents, and Practices, S. Doc. 101-28.

Records of Committee Actions

1.99 As Congress evolved during the 19th and 20th centuries, increasingly more of the workload was transferred from the floor of Congress to its committees and subcommittees. Published records of committee activity include hearings, both published and unpublished, reports, other documents that committees thought deserved wider circulation, and staff studies.

1.100 Congressional Serial Set: The Congressional Serial Set is a publication of United States Government documents authorized by Congress in December 1813. The set began with the 15th Congress (1815-17). It includes the Journals, committee reports, a wide variety of reports and messages from the executive branch, the Congressional Directory, and other documents Congress deemed worthy of wider distribution.

1.101 The volumes of the serial set are numbered sequentially from 1815 to the present. The volumes are organized by Congress, by Senate and House publications, and for most of its history by "reports" and "documents." At times during the 19th century, the documents were divided into "executive documents" and "miscellaneous documents" the former being documents of the executive branch and the latter being other documents. During the early 20th century the serial set was divided into Journals, reports, and documents.

1.102 Although the serial set is an excellent source of information on the Congress and the entire government, its use was hindered by the poor quality of its indexes until the Congressional Information Service, Inc. (CIS), a private publisher headquartered in Bethesda, MD, published its CIS U.S. Serial Set Index, 1789-1969. The CIS Index is divided into the following sections: subjects, names and organizations for whom private relief was considered, a numerical listing of reports and documents, and a shelf list of publications contained in each serial volume. For serial set documents from 1969 to the present, consult the CIS indexes and abstracts. CIS has also produced a microfiche edition of the serial set.

1.103 The Congressional Serial Set is a key source of documentation on the activities of the Congress. Committee reports, for example, are prepared by a committee in conjunction with the presentation of the committee's version of a bill or resolution to its parent body. The committee report is the committee's argument in favor of passing the measure it is sometimes accompanied by a minority view. In other cases the committee report is simply its version of the bill as it emerged from committee deliberations. Committee reports have, therefore, become key documents in determining the intent of Congress in its passage of legislation. In the case of investigating committees, the committee report is usually a presentation of its findings and recommendations for correcting the problems the committee was established to study.

1.104 American State Papers: The only publication comparable to the serial set for documents created before 1815 is American State Papers. From 1832 to 1861, publishers Gales and Seaton reproduced in this series a wide variety of early government documents, such as congressional committee reports, and messages and reports from the executive branch, that date roughly from 1789 to the 1830's. While American State Papers was an impressive undertaking for its day, its editors only published what they considered to be the most important reports and messages.

1.105 Gales and Seaton, the publishers, divided these documents into ten subject classes: Foreign relations, 1789-1828 Indian affairs, 1789-1827 finance, 1789-1828 commerce and navigation, 1789-1823 military affairs, 1789-1838 naval affairs, 1789-1836 Post Office Department, 1789-1833 public lands, 1789-37 claims, 1789-1823 miscellaneous, 1789-1823. Within each class, each document was assigned a sequential number which was roughly in chronological order. Each volume is indexed.

1.106 Published Congressional Hearings: During the 19th century, particularly after the Civil War, congressional committees began to hold hearings on the wide variety of issues that confronted them. For 20th century committees, hearings have become a standard mechanism for gathering information relevant to their main functions: considering legislation, investigating wrongdoing, and overseeing the activities of executive branch agencies. Congressional hearings were not published as a separate series until the 1890's. Hearings published before the 1890's were included in the Congressional Serial Set, often as a part of the committee's report. Congress did not require that its committees systematically transcribe their hearings until the passage of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946.

1.107 Committee hearings record the comments of witnesses and legislators on different issues and, more importantly, they record interesting exchanges between them. Witnesses and legislators may edit their remarks, but any corrections are supposed to be stylistic rather than substantive. Because each committee member may question a witness, the same issues may be covered several times in response to questions posed by different legislators. Individual hearings are rarely indexed, although a table of contents is normally provided indicating the names of witnesses.

1.108 The Congressional Information Service, Inc., has produced the most complete index to the published hearings of Congress in its CIS U.S. Congressional Committee Hearings Index, 1833-1969. The Hearings Index is arranged in the following sections: by subject, by names of witnesses, by committee or subcommittee holding the hearing, by the popular names of bills and laws, by titles of the hearings, by the Superintendent of Documents classification numbers, and by the report or document number (for those hearings that were published in a report or a document in the serial set). For hearings held from 1969 to the present, consult the CIS indexes and abstracts. CIS has also produced a microfiche edition of the published hearings of Congress.

Executive Session Testimony of D. Whittaker Chambers on August 3, 1948 before the Committee on Un-American Activities. RG 233, Records of the U.S. House of Representatives, National Archives.

1.109 Unpublished Congressional Hearings: Committees decide whether their hearing transcripts should be published. The decision not to publish usually is made because of the costs involved, the subject matter of the hearing (too controversial, too sensitive, too routine, or classified for reasons of national security), or committee idiosyncrasies. Consequently, a large body of unpublished transcripts of hearings exists principally in the National Archives and to a lesser extent in congressional committee offices. The content and format of these hearings is the same as those of hearings that were published.

1.110 Until recently no bibliographic control over these hearings transcripts existed. The Congressional Information Service, Inc., made an extensive search of the holdings of the National Archives, congressional committee offices, and a number of other repositories to locate all unpublished Senate hearings through 1964. The results are published as CIS Index to Unpublished U.S. Senate Committee Hearings, 1823-1964. This Index is organized in the same way as the CIS index to published congressional hearings. CIS has also produced a microfiche edition of the unpublished hearings of the Senate. CIS is currently searching for all unpublished hearings of the House through 1937 and it plans to publish an index and microfiche edition of these hearings as well. The cutoff dates of the CIS publications are dictated by access rules: unpublished records of the Senate are closed for 20 years and unpublished records of the House are closed for 50 years.

1.111 Committee Prints: Unlike the hearings, reports, and documents, committee prints are a heterogeneous category of publications intended primarily for the use of congressional committees. They often are printed in small quantities (less than 100 copies) and, unlike published hearings and serial set documents, they are not always preserved or distributed in any systematic way. Committee prints usually fall into one of the following categories: Monographs, investigative field reports, analyses of bills, confidential staff memoranda and reports, executive branch comments on legislation, reference materials, statistical compilations, hearings publications, and drafts of bills and reports.

1.112 The Congressional Information Service, Inc., conducted a major survey of congressional records at the National Archives, Library of Congress, Senate and House libraries, and large Government depository libraries throughout the country to prepare a collection of congressional committee prints. The CIS published its work as CIS U.S. Congressional Committee Prints Index, from the Earliest Publications through 1969. CIS has also produced a microfiche edition of the these committee prints. For more recent prints, see the CIS indexes described below.

1.113 CIS Indexes, 1970-present: Since 1969, CIS has published a single index to most of the different forms of congressional publications (reports, documents, hearings, prints, executive reports and documents, and public laws) but not to the Congressional Record. CIS produces a monthly index that permits users to access documents by subject by names of witnesses by titles of publications by bill, report, hearing, print and Superintendent of Documents numbers and by committee or subcommittee name. Citations in the index direct researchers to the CIS Annual Abstracts, which summarize each congressional committee publication. In addition to providing full bibliographic information, the abstractions of hearings lists all witnesses who testified, summarizes their testimony, and notes any supporting material they submitted for inclusion in the record. The index is published monthly and issued in a single volume every four years, while the Abstracts for a year are published annually in a single volume. The indexing database is also available on-line through DIALOG Information Services, Inc. The documents themselves are available in microfiche from CIS.

1.114 Bills and Resolutions: The Center for Legislative Archives has approximately 1,000 linear feet of the printed versions of House and Senate bills and resolutions from 1807 to 1954. A more complete collection is in the Law Library of the Library of Congress. Portions of the bills and resolutions have been microfiched by the Congressional Information Service, Inc.: CIS Congressional Bills, Resolutions, and Laws, 1943-84.

1.115 Acts of Congress: Acts of Congress, both private and public, treaties and conventions before 1950, proclamations, reorganization plans, and concurrent resolutions are published in the United States Statutes at Large. Each volume of the Statutes, except the first, is indexed alphabetically by subject.

1.116 The Statutes have been indexed in the following publications: A Synoptical Index to the Laws and Treaties of the United States of America from March 4, 1789 to March 3, 1851 (Boston: Charles C. Little and James Brown, 1852) George Winfield Scott and Middleton G. Beaman, Index Analysis of the Federal Statutes, 1873-1907 (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1908) Walter H. McClenon and Wilfred C. Gilbert, Index to the Federal Statutes, 1874-1931 (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1933).

1.117 Periodically the laws of the United States are codified. The first such codification took place in 1873 and was published in the Statutes at Large, but other codifications have been published in the United States Code. The Code is arranged by major subject areas of the law, called titles, such as agriculture (title 7), patents (title 35), and veterans benefits (title 38). The most recent version of the Code shows laws in force through the date of the publication of the Code. To find out if the Code is current for the particular subject of interest, researchers should consult volumes of the Statutes that postdate the Code.

1.118 A helpful version of the Code is the United States Code Annotated (St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company, 1973). This publication contains extensive notes for each section of the Code, indicating any previous laws that were changed. This is particularly useful in tracing the evolution of Federal law in a given subject area.

Other Publications of Congressional Materials

1.119 The Territorial Papers of the United States: Pursuant to several acts of Congress passed in the 1920's, the Department of State was directed to collect, edit, and publish the official papers of Territories of the United States. In the 1930's, the National Archives assumed this responsibility. As of this writing, the papers of all of those territories east of the Mississippi River, plus Arkansas and Missouri, have been published in a letterpress version, supplemented in many cases by microfilm editions only a microfilm edition exists for Iowa.

1.120 Because Congress played such a vital role in establishing Territories by legislating on a wide range of pertinent issues, and passing the acts admitting Territories to statehood, the records of Congress are an important source of territorial history. Numerous records of Congress relating to the Territories were therefore published in this series. Included, for example, are petitions from territorial residents, as well as various versions of the bills that eventually became acts granting statehood, and versions of proposed State constitutions. In addition many records of the Senate that related to the Territories were microfilmed as National Archives Microfilm Publication M200, Territorial Papers of the United States Senate, 1789-1873.

1.121 The Documentary History of the First Federal Congress of the United States of America, March 4, 1789-March 3, 1791: Since the mid-1960's, this project has sought to locate and publish all documents that relate to the First Congress. The First Federal Congress project has performed a comprehensive search of all extant materials, at the National Archives, the Library of Congress, and private or public repositories with collections in the 1789-1791 time span.

1.122 To date, the project has published the most authoritative versions of the Senate Legislative and Executive Journals, and the House Journal for the First Congress, as well as three volumes of legislative histories of all bills and resolutions introduced during the First Congress. In forthcoming volumes the project will reproduce petitions, the debates of Congress, the diary of Senator William Maclay (1789-1791), and other letters and papers of members of the First Congress.

1.123 This project is one of more than 250 historical documentary editions sponsored by the National Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC).

1.124 The Documentary History of the First Federal Elections, 1788-1790: The NHPRC also sponsors this project which anticipates the publication of a four-volume edition of documents and correspondence concerning the first congressional elections. The editors have selected for publication official records of the States as well as private correspondence and newspaper sources. The first two volumes have been published.

1.125 Other NHPRC Projects: In addition to the above NHPRC sponsored publications projects, congressional documents have been published in such projects as the Papers of John Adams, John Quincy Adams, James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Albert Gallatin, Joseph Henry, John Marshall, Andrew Jackson, Daniel Webster, Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun, James K. Polk, Jefferson Davis, Ulysses S. Grant, and Andrew Johnson. Some congressional documents also are reproduced in the National Archives Federal Documentary Microfilm Edition No. 1, Papers Relating to the Administration of the U.S. Patent Office During the Superintendency of William Thornton, 1802-1828.

1.126 National Archives Microfilm Publications: The Legislative Archives Division is filming the records of the first 14 Congresses, 1789-1817. The documentary record for this period is slight, but the extant records are of unusually high intrinsic value. The records after 1817 have been more systematically published in the Congressional Serial Set. The records will be filmed in two series: records that are bound and records that are unbound. In addition the barred and disallowed claims files of the Southern Claims Commission have been microfiched. See Appendix H for a complete listing of these microfilm publications.

Citing Published Congressional Materials

1.127 Because the unpublished records of Congress bear such a close relationship to published congressional materials, a section on how to cite them is also included. This is based on The Chicago Manual of Style, 13th edition. Note: These are all fictitious documents.

1.128 Floor Proceedings:

  • Senate Journal, 14th Cong., 1st sess., 7 Dec. 1819, 9-19.
  • Annals of Congress, 2d Cong., 1st sess., 215.
  • Congressional Globe, 39th Cong., 2d sess., 1867, 39, pt.9:9505.
  • Congressional Record, 71st Cong., 1st sess., 1930, 72, pt.10:10828-30.

1.129 Published Committee Documents:

  • American State Papers, Class V-Military Affairs, 2:558.
  • Malcolm to Calhoun, 2 Nov. 1818, Report of the Secretary of War Relative to Roads and Canals (7 Jan. 1819), 15th Cong., 2d sess., H. Doc. 87.
  • Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, The Mutual Security Act of 1956, 84th Cong., 2d sess., 1956, S. Rept. 2273, 5.
  • House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Background Materials on Mutual Defense and Development Programs: Fiscal Year 1965, 88th Cong., 2d sess., 1964, Committee Print, 24.

1.130 Published Congressional Hearings:

  • Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Hearings on the Situation in China, 80th Cong., 1st sess., July 19, 1947, 57-68.

Other Sources

Textual Records in the National Archives Relating to the Records of Congress

1.131 Continental and Confederation Congresses, 1774-1789: The immediate predecessors to the modern Congress were the Continental and Confederation Congresses. The First and Second Continental Congresses met from 1774 through 1781 these bodies organized resistance to the British, drafted the Declaration of Independence, and managed the war effort during the Revolution. The Articles of Confederation, approved in 1781, established a new central government, the primary feature of which was a Congress. The Confederation Congress lasted from 1781 to 1789, when the new government established by the Constitution took effect. The records of the Continental and Confederation Congresses have been reproduced as National Archives Microfilm Publications M247, Papers of the Continental Congress, 1774-1789 and M332, Miscellaneous Papers of the Continental Congress, 1774-1789. The original records are part of Record Group 360.

1.132 Original Enrolled Bills: The final version of a bill or joint resolution that is signed by the President, making it an Act of Congress, is called the enrolled version. These are published in the United States Statutes at Large. The originals, 1789-present, are among the General Records of the U.S. Government, Record Group 11. Portions of these records have been microfilmed as National Archives Microfilm Publications M337, Enrolled Original Acts and Resolutions of the U.S. Congress, 1789-1823, and M1326, Enrolled Acts and Resolutions of Congress, 53d Congress, 2d Session—84th Congress, 2d Session, 1893-1956.

Related Records and Materials Outside the National Archives

Private Papers and Newspapers

1.133 Papers of Congressmen and Senators: There is often a close relationship between the private papers of legislators, particularly those who were committee chairmen, and official congressional committee records at the National Archives. Before the end of World War II, the amount of staff available to legislators was limited to several individuals and committee staffs were also extremely small by modern standards. Because the distinction between committee and personal staff available to legislators remained unclear until the passage of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946, the distinction between the committee records and personal papers the staff maintained was also ambiguous. The result is that original committee records and copies of committee records are often in the private collections of individual legislators.

1.134 By tradition the papers of Members of Congress are considered the private property of the legislator. These collections have sometimes been destroyed, retained by the family, or donated to a repository. The Senate Historical Office produced the following publication that lists the locations of the extant papers of all senators who served from 1789-1982: Kathryn Allamong Jacob, editor, Guide to Research Collections of Former United States Senators, 1789-1982 (Washington: Senate Historical Office, 1983). Copies are available free of charge from the Senate Historical Office, U.S. Senate, Washington, DC 20510. The House Office for the Bicentennial has prepared a similar compilation for House members: Cynthia Pease Miller, editor, A Guide to Research Collections of Former Members of the House of Representatives, 1789-1987 (Washington: Office of the Bicentennial of the U.S. House of Representatives, 1988).

1.135 The greatest concentration of papers of former legislators is in the Manuscript Division, Library of Congress. The Library has published a listing of their congressional materials: John J. McDonough, compiler, Members of Congress: A Checklist of Their Papers in the Manuscript Division, Library of Congress (Washington: Library of Congress, 1980).

1.136 Newspapers: Because members of Congress have long drawn the attention of political journalists, newspapers remain an excellent source of information on the opinions and activities of members. Often information that may not appear among the official records of Congress or the private papers of legislators can be gleaned from newspaper sources because many journalists enjoyed ready access to the politicians. While excellent as sources, newspapers have to be used with caution, since many of them, in the past particularly, have been overtly partisan in their point of view.

1.137 For the 1790's, researchers should consult the National Gazette (1791-93), published by Philip Freneau the Gazette of the United States (1789-94), published by John Fenno and the Philadelphia Aurora (1790-1835), published by Benjamin Franklin Bache and William Duane. The National Intelligencer, ultimately published by Joseph Gales and William Seaton, is probably the most authoritative source for the period from 1800 to the 1860's. By the mid-19th century a number of new papers devoted extensive coverage to Congress: New York Tribune (New York Herald Tribune), 1841-1964 New York Times, 1851-present Boston Journal, 1833-1903 New York World, 1860-1931 Baltimore Sun, 1837-present and the Washington Post, 1877-present. While all of these newspapers have been microfilmed, only The New York Times has been completely indexed. The Times Index will provide the dates of episodes that can be used to search other newspapers.

Office Records

1.138 Architect of the Capitol: The records of the Architect of the Capitol consist of textual, photographic, and cartographic materials concerning the Capitol Building and grounds and other related buildings. These records date from the early 19th century to the present. In addition, because the Architect has had responsibility for a number of other buildings in the Washington, DC area, there are materials on the Supreme Court the Library of Congress Union Station Gallaudet University Columbia Hospital for Women St. Elizabeths Hospital the Washington, DC Jail the Botanic Garden the Patent Office the Post Office the Washington Aqueduct and statues, monuments, and memorials.

1.139 Textual Records: The Architect's textual materials amount to about 500 linear feet that date from the 1800's to the present. Important correspondents include Benjamin Henry Latrobe, Frederick Law Olmsted, Robert Mills, David Lynn, Thomas U. Walter, George Stewart, Carrere & Hastings, William Strickland, Edward Clark, Montgomery C. Meigs, Jefferson Davis, and Joseph Henry. There is also extensive correspondence with such artists as Thomas Crawford, Constantino Brumidi, Vinnie Ream Hoxie, Clark Mills, Randolph Rogers, and William Rinehart.

1.140 Photographic Records: The Architect maintains a collection of approximately 70,000 original photographic negatives that date from the 1850's to the present. These photographs relate principally to the Capitol itself (particularly construction projects), works of art (both paintings and sculptures), interiors of rooms, and pictures of ceremonial events such as inaugurals, joint sessions and meetings of Congress, and the unveiling of art works.

1.141 Architectural Records: The Architect also maintains approximately 70,000 architectural drawings that relate to the Capitol Building and its grounds, and other buildings under the jurisdiction of the Architect, such as congressional office buildings, Library of Congress buildings, and the Supreme Court Building, as well as several other public buildings in Washington, DC.

1.142 For further information researchers should write to: Curator for the Architect of the Capitol, the Capitol, Washington, DC 20515.

1.143 Senate Historical Office: The Senate Historical Office has collected from a number of institutions approximately 30,000 photographic copies of images that relate to the Senate. The collection is organized into the following categories: portraits of senators committees, caucuses, and meetings groups of senators special events presidents and vice presidents cartoon collections and graphic prints demonstrations, rallies, parades, visitors officers and employees of the Senate Senate photographer's prints Capitol/Senate buildings and grounds Arthur Scott negatives Senate photographic studio negatives Democratic Party negatives King Library contacts and negatives unprinted Historical Office negatives and contacts.

1.144 Researchers interested in viewing or obtaining copies of these materials should write to: Senate Historical Office, U.S. Senate, Washington, DC 20510.

1.145 Office of Senate Curator: The Office of the Senate Curator maintains a collection of approximately 400 original prints and cartoons that relate to the Senate. The collection dates from the 1840s to the early 20th centuries. For more information contact the Office of Senate Curator, U.S. Senate, Washington, DC 20510.

1. For the report on House records, see T. R. Schellenberg to Thomas Owen, Apr. 9, 1937, Memoranda from Deputy Examiners, Accessions Division, Records of the National Archives, Record Group 64, National Archives, Washington, DC (hereafter referred to as Schellenberg, RG 64, NA). For general works on the subject, see Buford Rowland, "Recordkeeping Practices of the House of Representatives," National Archives Accessions, Jan. 1957, pp. 1-19 Richard A. Baker, "The Records of Congress: Opportunities and Obstacles in the Senate," and Anna Kasten Nelson, "Disorder in the House: The Inaccessible Record," both in The Public Historian (Summer 1980), pp. 62-72 and 73-83, respectively Patricia Aronsson, "Congressional Records as Archival Sources," Government Publications Review, 1981, pp. 295-302. [Back to text] 2. Rowland, "Recordkeeping Practices of the House," pp. 3-4 American State Papers, Class X-Miscellaneous, 2: 245. [Back to text]

3. Thad Page, "Memorandum Re Records of the Congress," Jan. 21, 1946, Legislative Records Branch, RG 64, NA (hereafter referred to as LRB, RG 64, NA) Rowland, "Recordkeeping Practices of the House," pp. 7-8. [Back to text]

4. 31 Stat 642 Rowland, "Recordkeeping Practices of the House," pp. 11-13. [Back to text]

5. 48 Stat 1122-24 Public Law 73-432 Arthur Kimberly to the Director of Archival Service, Dec. 21, 1936, LRB, RG 64, NA Frank McAlister, Accession Inventory no. 59, Apr. 1, 1937, LRB, RG 64, NA S. Res. 99, 75th Cong. [Back to text]

6. Schellenberg, RG 64, NA Administrative Secretary to the Archivist, July 5, 1938, LRB, RG 64, NA House Report 917, 75th Cong. the photographs are in H. Res. 222, Committee on the Library, Legislative Files (HR 75A-D22), 75th Cong., Records of the U.S. House of Representatives, Record Group 233, NA. [Back to text]

7. Washington Post, Nov. 19, 1944, attached to Archivist's note to Administrative Assistant, Nov. 20, 1944, LRB, RG 64, NA: Page to Alfred Elliot, Nov. 28, 1944, LRB, RG 64, NA Page to Dirksen, Nov. 28, 1944, LRB, RG 64, NA Dirksen to Buck, Nov. 29, 1944, LRB, RG 64, NA. [Back to text]

8. Harold Hufford to Page, Jan. 18, 1945, LRB, RG 64, NA Buck to George Galloway, Feb. 19, 1946, LRB, RG 64, NA Page, "Memorandum Re Records of Congress," Jan. 21, 1946, LRB, RG 64, NA. [Back to text]

Bibliographic note: Web version based on Guide to the Records of the United States House of Representatives at the National Archives, 1789-1989: Bicentennial Edition (Doct. No. 100-245). By Charles E. Schamel, Mary Rephlo, Rodney Ross, David Kepley, Robert W. Coren, and James Gregory Bradsher. Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration, 1989.

This Web version is updated from time to time to include records processed since 1989.

This page was last reviewed on April 7, 2021.
Contact us with questions or comments.